Measuring racial bias in employment services in Colombia

In this paper, we document de facto, implicit, and explicit racial biases within the public employment service in Colombia. By combining administrative data about job seekers and job openings with direct surveys to job counselors, including a Race Implicit Association Test, we measure different types of racial bias. We find that while job counselors do not self-report biased attitudes against Afro-descendant individuals, the majority exhibit high levels of implicit bias, which also correlates strongly with observed lower referral rates of Afro-descendants to job openings. In addition, we provide information to a randomized group of job counselors about their implicit bias and test if this information changes their referral behavior. While we demonstrate that the implicit bias of counselors contributes to racial gaps in labor outcomes, we do not find that providing feedback on this unconscious bias changes referral behavior. • We document implicit, explicit, and de facto bias against Afro-descendants in job services. • Counselors have high implicit bias but do not report bias against Afro-descendant job seekers. • Afro-descendants are 15% less likely to be referred and 23% less likely to be hired once referred. • Implicit bias correlates with counselors’ actions and contributes to racial gaps in employment. • Information about job counselors’ implicit bias does not change referral behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Development Economics
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103435
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring racial bias in employment services in Colombia

Jaime Millán‐Quijano, Suzanne Duryea, Judith Morrison, Yanira Oviedo
2 citations
Journal of Development Economics
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
2.26
article

Measuring racial bias in employment services in Colombia

Jaime Millán‐Quijano, Suzanne Duryea, Judith Morrison, Yanira Oviedo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we document de facto, implicit, and explicit racial biases within the public employment service in Colombia. By combining administrative data about job seekers and job openings with direct surveys to job counselors, including a Race Implicit Association Test, we measure different types of racial bias. We find that while job counselors do not self-report biased attitudes against Afro-descendant individuals, the majority exhibit high levels of implicit bias, which also correlates strongly with observed lower referral rates of Afro-descendants to job openings. In addition, we provide information to a randomized group of job counselors about their implicit bias and test if this information changes their referral behavior. While we demonstrate that the implicit bias of counselors contributes to racial gaps in labor outcomes, we do not find that providing feedback on this unconscious bias changes referral behavior. • We document implicit, explicit, and de facto bias against Afro-descendants in job services. • Counselors have high implicit bias but do not report bias against Afro-descendant job seekers. • Afro-descendants are 15% less likely to be referred and 23% less likely to be hired once referred. • Implicit bias correlates with counselors’ actions and contributes to racial gaps in employment. • Information about job counselors’ implicit bias does not change referral behavior.

Journal of Development EconomicsVol. 174
Infectious Diseases Society of America (US), Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (CO), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Inter-American Development Bank, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Islamic Development Bank, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.