Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade

Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meat Science
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109738
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade

G A Miller, Carol-Anne Duthie, N.R. Lambe, Holly Nisbet et al.
4 citations
Meat Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.36
article

Meat yields and primal cut weights from beef carcasses can be predicted with similar accuracies using in-abattoir 3D measurements or EUROP classification grade

G A Miller, Carol-Anne Duthie, N.R. Lambe, Holly Nisbet, Andrea Doeschl‐Wilson, David Barclay, Alexander Wheaton
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) measurements extracted from beef carcass images were used to predict the weight of four saleable meat yield (SMY) traits (total SMY and the SMY of the forequarter, flank, and hindquarter) and four primal cuts (sirloin, ribeye, topside and rump). Data were collected at two UK abattoirs using time-of-flight cameras and manual bone out methods. Predictions were made for 484 carcasses, using multiple linear regression (MLR) or machine learning (ML) techniques. Model inputs included breed type, sex, and abattoir as fixed effects, and cold carcass weight, visually assessed EUROP fat and conformation classes, and 3D measurements as covariates. Machine learning techniques were only used for models including 3D measurements. The CCW and fixed effects resulted in high accuracy (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.90, RMSE = 2.12-3.96 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56-0.67, RMSE = 0.36-0.91 kg), and including the EUROP covariates increased accuracies (SMY R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.96, RMSE = 2.00-3.11 kg, primal R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58-0.79, RMSE = 0.36-0.79 kg). The 3D measurement covariates and abattoir resulted in moderate accuracy (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.39-0.58, RMSE = 3.26-10.31 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.33-0.52, RMSE = 0.44-1.14 kg) and high accuracy when combined with CCW and all fixed effects (SMY MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72-0.95, RMSE = 1.81-3.42 kg, primal MLR R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.74, RMSE = 0.40-0.81 kg). The best ML models resulted in similar accuracies to the MLR models. Models including 3D measurements produced similar accuracies to models built using conventional data recorded at the abattoir, indicting the potential for automated prediction.

Meat ScienceVol. 222
Roslin Institute (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Agricultural and Horticultural Development Board, Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, Scotland’s Rural College, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.