Hemostatic Outcome Definitions in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Challenges in Cohorts From Rotterdam (2019–2023) and Melbourne (2016–2022)

This international comparison shows that standardizing hemostatic outcome definitions alone is insufficient for sensible comparison. Uniform interpretation of definitions, consistent frequency of outcome ascertainment, and stratification based on patient populations and ECMO practices are required. Our results highlight the granularity of detail needed for cross-center comparison of hemostatic outcomes in pediatric ECMO. Further work is needed as we move toward potential multicenter trials of pediatric ECMO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000003679
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemostatic Outcome Definitions in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Challenges in Cohorts From Rotterdam (2019–2023) and Melbourne (2016–2022)

Fiona Newall, Hui Ping Yaw, Natasha Letunica, Chantal Attard et al.
1 citations
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
article

Hemostatic Outcome Definitions in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Challenges in Cohorts From Rotterdam (2019–2023) and Melbourne (2016–2022)

Fiona Newall, Hui Ping Yaw, Natasha Letunica, Chantal Attard, Joppe G. Drop, Derek Best, Joanne McKittrick, C. Heleen van Ommen, Graeme MacLaren, Roberto Chiletti, Stephen Horton, Amy Johansen, Suelyn Van Den Helm, Rebecca Barton, Warwick W. Butt, Paul Monagle, Matthijs de Hoog, Vera Ignjatović, Yves d’Udekem, Willem P. de Boode, Enno D. Wildschut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This international comparison shows that standardizing hemostatic outcome definitions alone is insufficient for sensible comparison. Uniform interpretation of definitions, consistent frequency of outcome ascertainment, and stratification based on patient populations and ECMO practices are required. Our results highlight the granularity of detail needed for cross-center comparison of hemostatic outcomes in pediatric ECMO. Further work is needed as we move toward potential multicenter trials of pediatric ECMO.

Pediatric Critical Care MedicineVol. 26(3)
Royal Children's Hospital (AU), Children's National (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), The University of Melbourne (AU), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital (US), Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL), National University Health System (SG), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
Stichting de Drie Lichten, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.