Developing a power scale based on Etzioni's organizational commitment classification for school principals

This study aims to develop a validated and reliable scale grounded in Amitai Etzioni’s organizational compliance framework, addressing a gap in measuring coercive, remunerative, and normative power types in educational leadership. While there are scales in the literature designed to measure the types of power used by school principals, no scale has been identified that corresponds to Amitai Etzioni’s classification of power types—coercive, remunerative, and normative—used to explain organizational compliance (normative, calculative, and alienative). The power sources employed by school principals are crucial for influencing school stakeholders and directing them toward organizational goals. Etzioni’s classification of power types is notably straightforward and comprehensive, and when developed as a scale, it can be utilized alongside other measurement tools. Therefore, there is a need for a concise, practical, and validated scale to measure the types of power used by school principals. The analyses were conducted on data from 580 primary school teachers working in public schools. The development and validation processes were carried out in multiple steps. The literature was reviewed, in-depth interviews were conducted with school stakeholders, and an item pool was created. The suitability of the scale items for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was tested, yielding a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.904 and a significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity. According to the CFA results, the model fit was appropriate, and the correlation between factors and items was satisfactory. Based on the results, a three-factor scale comprising 15 items was developed. School principals' power types were conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with three dimensions: normative power, remunerative power, and coercive power. As a result of the analyses, it was concluded that the “Scale of Power Types Used by School Principals,” defining 15 items across three dimensions, is acceptable and applicable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Teacher Development and Education
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29329/journalted.32
Primary Topic
Organizational Learning and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a power scale based on Etzioni's organizational commitment classification for school principals

Yılmaz Tonbul, Ayfer Köşker
Journal of Teacher Development and Education
Organizational Learning and Leadership
article

Developing a power scale based on Etzioni's organizational commitment classification for school principals

Yılmaz Tonbul, Ayfer Köşker
article en

Abstract

This study aims to develop a validated and reliable scale grounded in Amitai Etzioni’s organizational compliance framework, addressing a gap in measuring coercive, remunerative, and normative power types in educational leadership. While there are scales in the literature designed to measure the types of power used by school principals, no scale has been identified that corresponds to Amitai Etzioni’s classification of power types—coercive, remunerative, and normative—used to explain organizational compliance (normative, calculative, and alienative). The power sources employed by school principals are crucial for influencing school stakeholders and directing them toward organizational goals. Etzioni’s classification of power types is notably straightforward and comprehensive, and when developed as a scale, it can be utilized alongside other measurement tools. Therefore, there is a need for a concise, practical, and validated scale to measure the types of power used by school principals. The analyses were conducted on data from 580 primary school teachers working in public schools. The development and validation processes were carried out in multiple steps. The literature was reviewed, in-depth interviews were conducted with school stakeholders, and an item pool was created. The suitability of the scale items for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was tested, yielding a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.904 and a significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity. According to the CFA results, the model fit was appropriate, and the correlation between factors and items was satisfactory. Based on the results, a three-factor scale comprising 15 items was developed. School principals' power types were conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with three dimensions: normative power, remunerative power, and coercive power. As a result of the analyses, it was concluded that the “Scale of Power Types Used by School Principals,” defining 15 items across three dimensions, is acceptable and applicable.

Journal of Teacher Development and EducationVol. 2(2)
Ege University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Organizational Learning and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.