Evaluation of a culture-independent gastrointestinal multiplex PCR panel for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens detection of gastrointestinal pathogens

Objective: All across the world, gastrointestinal (GI) infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in young children, patients in intensive care units, and patients with weakened immune systems. In this study we aimed to assess the Gastroenteritis RT-qPCR MX-24T Panel's utility as a standard technique for identifying gastrointestinal pathogens. Methods: In this study, 76 stool samples from intensive care patients were tested for bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens using the Bio-Speedy® Gastroenteritis RT-qPCR MX-24T Panel kit. Results: In this study, 31 out of 76 samples gave positive results. Eight bacterial (Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and Clostridium difficile binary toxin A/B), three viral (Astrovirus, Norovirus (GI/GII and Rotavirus (A)) and two parasitic (Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia lamblia) agents were detected from the stool samples of intensive care patients. While only a single agent was detected in the 22 samples, multiple agents were detected in 9 (30%). The most detected agent was EAEC (n=11), followed by Campylobacter spp. (n=7). EAEC and Campylobacter spp. were detected in 3 samples with multiple agents. Conclusion: The GI panel can minimize the need for additional diagnostic testing and unnecessary antibiotic use by rapidly identifying a wide range of infections detectable only by molecular methods, as well as agents detectable by traditional conventional diagnostic methods. In this way, it may lead to a shorter hospital stay. In addition, we think that further studies should be conducted to determine whether the simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens in a sample in our study is clinically important.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dicle Medical Journal / Dicle Tip Dergisi
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1607944
Primary Topic
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a culture-independent gastrointestinal multiplex PCR panel for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens detection of gastrointestinal pathogens

Ömer Acer, Erdal Özbek, Selahattin Atmaca, Delal Polat Demir
Dicle Medical Journal / Dicle Tip Dergisi
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
article

Evaluation of a culture-independent gastrointestinal multiplex PCR panel for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens detection of gastrointestinal pathogens

Ömer Acer, Erdal Özbek, Selahattin Atmaca, Delal Polat Demir
article en

Abstract

Objective: All across the world, gastrointestinal (GI) infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in young children, patients in intensive care units, and patients with weakened immune systems. In this study we aimed to assess the Gastroenteritis RT-qPCR MX-24T Panel's utility as a standard technique for identifying gastrointestinal pathogens. Methods: In this study, 76 stool samples from intensive care patients were tested for bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens using the Bio-Speedy® Gastroenteritis RT-qPCR MX-24T Panel kit. Results: In this study, 31 out of 76 samples gave positive results. Eight bacterial (Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and Clostridium difficile binary toxin A/B), three viral (Astrovirus, Norovirus (GI/GII and Rotavirus (A)) and two parasitic (Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia lamblia) agents were detected from the stool samples of intensive care patients. While only a single agent was detected in the 22 samples, multiple agents were detected in 9 (30%). The most detected agent was EAEC (n=11), followed by Campylobacter spp. (n=7). EAEC and Campylobacter spp. were detected in 3 samples with multiple agents. Conclusion: The GI panel can minimize the need for additional diagnostic testing and unnecessary antibiotic use by rapidly identifying a wide range of infections detectable only by molecular methods, as well as agents detectable by traditional conventional diagnostic methods. In this way, it may lead to a shorter hospital stay. In addition, we think that further studies should be conducted to determine whether the simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens in a sample in our study is clinically important.

Dicle Medical Journal / Dicle Tip DergisiVol. 51(4)
Dicle University (TR), Siirt Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.