Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Act as Virtual Safety Officers?

This study examines the reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems─specifically, the large language models (LLMs) ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini─to provide accurate lab safety advice, a critical need in high-risk environments. We evaluated LLM performance in addressing several chemical safety queries relevant to academic chemistry laboratories across the criteria of accuracy, relevance, clarity, completeness, and engagement. While all the LLMs tested generally delivered clear and accurate guidance, some shortcomings were identified, raising concerns about reliability during safety emergencies or for nonexpert users. Despite these issues, the findings suggest that with further refinement, AI has the potential to become a valuable tool for lab safety that is complementary to a human laboratory safety officer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00097
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Act as Virtual Safety Officers?

Neal P. Mankad, Simon G. Gersib, S. M. Supundrika Subasinghe, Thomas M. Frueh
4 citations
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
Topic Modeling
1.39
article

Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Act as Virtual Safety Officers?

Neal P. Mankad, Simon G. Gersib, S. M. Supundrika Subasinghe, Thomas M. Frueh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study examines the reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems─specifically, the large language models (LLMs) ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini─to provide accurate lab safety advice, a critical need in high-risk environments. We evaluated LLM performance in addressing several chemical safety queries relevant to academic chemistry laboratories across the criteria of accuracy, relevance, clarity, completeness, and engagement. While all the LLMs tested generally delivered clear and accurate guidance, some shortcomings were identified, raising concerns about reliability during safety emergencies or for nonexpert users. Despite these issues, the findings suggest that with further refinement, AI has the potential to become a valuable tool for lab safety that is complementary to a human laboratory safety officer.

ACS Chemical Health & SafetyVol. 32(1)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Topic Modeling
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.