A Micro‐CT Based Cadaveric Study Investigating Bone Density Changes During Hip Arthroplasty Surgery

The impact of broaching and uncemented implantation on bone density during total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. Previous studies have typically examined extracted bone sections, which may not directly correlate with outcomes in human hip systems. This study aimed to evaluate bone density changes resulting from broaching and uncemented implantation using micro-computed tomography (μCT) on cadaveric samples. An in-house density calibration phantom (DCP) was developed by validating the densities of polymer inserts through mass and volume measurements. Its performance was then evaluated using lamb bone in comparison with a commercial DCP (QRM-50124). The sensitivity of density predictions to μCT scan parameters was also evaluated with the lamb bone. Additionally, density predictions from medical-CT and μCT scans were compared using the in-house DCP. Finally, uncemented THA procedures were performed on three cadaveric femurs, each undergoing three μCT scans at various surgical stages to assess changes in bone density. The density predictions obtained using the in-house DCP achieved an accuracy of ±0.097 g/cc compared to QRM-50124, with a precision of ±0.052 g/cc. The sensitivity to changes in μCT scan parameters was ±0.022 g/cc. Notably, density predictions from medical-CT and μCT scans were similar, particularly in cortical bone. Broaching and implantation led to an average increase in bone density of 0.137 g/cc, which was attributed to the accumulation of bone debris around the bone-implant interface. This accumulation raised the bone volume fraction, ranging from 3.31% to 20.69%, which acts as an autograft. These measurements have been made for the first time using a µCT and an in-house DCP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26032
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Micro‐CT Based Cadaveric Study Investigating Bone Density Changes During Hip Arthroplasty Surgery

Paul F. Wilson, Richard King, Arnab Palit, Sofia Goia et al.
2 citations
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
1.15
article

A Micro‐CT Based Cadaveric Study Investigating Bone Density Changes During Hip Arthroplasty Surgery

Paul F. Wilson, Richard King, Arnab Palit, Sofia Goia, Mark A. Williams, Vineet Seemala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The impact of broaching and uncemented implantation on bone density during total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. Previous studies have typically examined extracted bone sections, which may not directly correlate with outcomes in human hip systems. This study aimed to evaluate bone density changes resulting from broaching and uncemented implantation using micro-computed tomography (μCT) on cadaveric samples. An in-house density calibration phantom (DCP) was developed by validating the densities of polymer inserts through mass and volume measurements. Its performance was then evaluated using lamb bone in comparison with a commercial DCP (QRM-50124). The sensitivity of density predictions to μCT scan parameters was also evaluated with the lamb bone. Additionally, density predictions from medical-CT and μCT scans were compared using the in-house DCP. Finally, uncemented THA procedures were performed on three cadaveric femurs, each undergoing three μCT scans at various surgical stages to assess changes in bone density. The density predictions obtained using the in-house DCP achieved an accuracy of ±0.097 g/cc compared to QRM-50124, with a precision of ±0.052 g/cc. The sensitivity to changes in μCT scan parameters was ±0.022 g/cc. Notably, density predictions from medical-CT and μCT scans were similar, particularly in cortical bone. Broaching and implantation led to an average increase in bone density of 0.137 g/cc, which was attributed to the accumulation of bone debris around the bone-implant interface. This accumulation raised the bone volume fraction, ranging from 3.31% to 20.69%, which acts as an autograft. These measurements have been made for the first time using a µCT and an in-house DCP.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research®Vol. 43(4)
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB)
Corin Group, University of Warwick, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.