Public entrepreneurial opportunities: How institutional logics shape public servants' opportunity evaluation

Abstract Which entrepreneurial opportunities do public servants find appealing, and what influences their evaluation? Our investigation of 14 Norwegian municipal entrepreneurial projects indicates that public servants positively assess the attractiveness of welfare, economic, and participatory opportunities. Their evaluations are shaped by public sector logics. Our contribution is twofold: first, we connect the discourse on entrepreneurial opportunities with that of institutional logics, demonstrating that evaluations of public entrepreneurial opportunities depend on the presence and hierarchy of state, market, and community logics. This underscores the limited yet meaningful agency of public servants in these evaluations. Second, we illuminate underexplored public entrepreneurial opportunities by proposing a taxonomy that categorizes them based on the interplay of state, market, and community logics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13920
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public entrepreneurial opportunities: How institutional logics shape public servants' opportunity evaluation

Petter Gullmark, Ali Aslan Gümüşay, Gry Agnete Alsos, Tommy Høyvarde Clausen
3 citations
Public Administration Review
Management and Organizational Studies
2.02
article

Public entrepreneurial opportunities: How institutional logics shape public servants' opportunity evaluation

Petter Gullmark, Ali Aslan Gümüşay, Gry Agnete Alsos, Tommy Høyvarde Clausen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Which entrepreneurial opportunities do public servants find appealing, and what influences their evaluation? Our investigation of 14 Norwegian municipal entrepreneurial projects indicates that public servants positively assess the attractiveness of welfare, economic, and participatory opportunities. Their evaluations are shaped by public sector logics. Our contribution is twofold: first, we connect the discourse on entrepreneurial opportunities with that of institutional logics, demonstrating that evaluations of public entrepreneurial opportunities depend on the presence and hierarchy of state, market, and community logics. This underscores the limited yet meaningful agency of public servants in these evaluations. Second, we illuminate underexplored public entrepreneurial opportunities by proposing a taxonomy that categorizes them based on the interplay of state, market, and community logics.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(5)
Nord University (NO), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Management and Organizational Studies
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public entrepreneurial opportunities: How institutional logics shape public servants' opportunity evaluation — Petter Gullmark, Ali Aslan Gümüşay, et al. · Public Administration Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS