Motivating conservation action in the Upper Midwest: Source attention, information seeking and sharing, and farmers' land management decisions

Abstract Adoption of on‐farm conservation strategies, such as edge‐of‐field practices, has the potential to reduce nutrient runoff, promote greater biodiversity, and improve water quality. To date, adoption rates among farmers are extremely low. Communication with farmers has been identified as a vital strategy to encourage the voluntary adoption of these practices and policies that promote on‐farm conservation. Yet little is known about which information sources shape farmers' concerns about conservation practices, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, and ultimately, adoption behaviors. Using the Social Amplification of Risk Framework, the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model, and a cross‐sectional survey, we examined farmers' concerns about nitrate loss and water quality, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, attention to messages and information sources, and communication behaviors. We received N = 474 completed surveys. Attention to agricultural associations was associated with decreased concern about nitrates and diminished perceptions of the benefits of edge‐of‐field practices. Farmers paying greater attention to non‐agricultural and social media sources were more likely to share and seek information. Attention to interpersonal sources was associated with greater adoption behaviors. This work highlights the importance of farmers' social networks, exposure to multiple information sources, and the need to identify new strategies for engagement and direct communication with hard‐to‐reach audiences. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for conservation communication and land management practices to promote environmental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13287
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivating conservation action in the Upper Midwest: Source attention, information seeking and sharing, and farmers' land management decisions

Dara M. Wald, Laura Witzling, Miguel Alejandro Díaz Manrique, Jaqueline Comito
3 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Climate Change Communication and Perception
3.40
article

Motivating conservation action in the Upper Midwest: Source attention, information seeking and sharing, and farmers' land management decisions

Dara M. Wald, Laura Witzling, Miguel Alejandro Díaz Manrique, Jaqueline Comito
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Adoption of on‐farm conservation strategies, such as edge‐of‐field practices, has the potential to reduce nutrient runoff, promote greater biodiversity, and improve water quality. To date, adoption rates among farmers are extremely low. Communication with farmers has been identified as a vital strategy to encourage the voluntary adoption of these practices and policies that promote on‐farm conservation. Yet little is known about which information sources shape farmers' concerns about conservation practices, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, and ultimately, adoption behaviors. Using the Social Amplification of Risk Framework, the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model, and a cross‐sectional survey, we examined farmers' concerns about nitrate loss and water quality, perceptions of the risks and benefits of conservation practices, attention to messages and information sources, and communication behaviors. We received N = 474 completed surveys. Attention to agricultural associations was associated with decreased concern about nitrates and diminished perceptions of the benefits of edge‐of‐field practices. Farmers paying greater attention to non‐agricultural and social media sources were more likely to share and seek information. Attention to interpersonal sources was associated with greater adoption behaviors. This work highlights the importance of farmers' social networks, exposure to multiple information sources, and the need to identify new strategies for engagement and direct communication with hard‐to‐reach audiences. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for conservation communication and land management practices to promote environmental health.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(1)
Iowa State University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Iowa Nutrient Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.