Mitigating process improvement project failures: leveraging organizational responses and lessons learned

Purpose Despite technological advancements within process improvement (PI) projects, two out of three PI projects failed. This paper aims to identify the critical failure factors (CFFs) linked to PI projects and propose suitable mitigation strategies. It also examines how PI practitioners can leverage unsuccessful projects to stimulate learning from failure, turning them into opportunities for development and growth. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach involving semi-structured interviews with 21 PI professionals was utilized to capture the CFFs and their corresponding mitigation best practices. Findings The study reveals 14 CFFs spanning from issues at the top-level management, down to challenges at the project level and shortcomings at the individual level. We uncover new evolving factors related to “big data analysis and technology implementations”, “project scope complexity”, “unrealistic goal setting”, “frequent shifts in management priorities”, “unclear problem definition” and “prolonged execution duration”. Moreover, results emphasize the significance of fostering a “culture of learning from failure” and “transparency in failure acknowledgment” to avert failures. Originality/value This study is the first to provide real-world solutions and guidelines to proactively mitigate PI failures. It offers insights for PI practitioners and broadens their view on emerging factors to implement preventive strategies, building on learning from failures and those of others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Benchmarking An International Journal
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2024-0526
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating process improvement project failures: leveraging organizational responses and lessons learned

Kevin Linderman, Ravindra S. Goonetilleke, Mariam Bader, Jiju Antony et al.
3 citations
Benchmarking An International Journal
Construction Project Management and Performance
1.47
article

Mitigating process improvement project failures: leveraging organizational responses and lessons learned

Kevin Linderman, Ravindra S. Goonetilleke, Mariam Bader, Jiju Antony, Raja Jayaraman, Roger W. Hoerl
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose Despite technological advancements within process improvement (PI) projects, two out of three PI projects failed. This paper aims to identify the critical failure factors (CFFs) linked to PI projects and propose suitable mitigation strategies. It also examines how PI practitioners can leverage unsuccessful projects to stimulate learning from failure, turning them into opportunities for development and growth. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach involving semi-structured interviews with 21 PI professionals was utilized to capture the CFFs and their corresponding mitigation best practices. Findings The study reveals 14 CFFs spanning from issues at the top-level management, down to challenges at the project level and shortcomings at the individual level. We uncover new evolving factors related to “big data analysis and technology implementations”, “project scope complexity”, “unrealistic goal setting”, “frequent shifts in management priorities”, “unclear problem definition” and “prolonged execution duration”. Moreover, results emphasize the significance of fostering a “culture of learning from failure” and “transparency in failure acknowledgment” to avert failures. Originality/value This study is the first to provide real-world solutions and guidelines to proactively mitigate PI failures. It offers insights for PI practitioners and broadens their view on emerging factors to implement preventive strategies, building on learning from failures and those of others.

Benchmarking An International JournalVol. 33(3)
New Mexico State University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Union College (US), William Penn University (US), Northumbria University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Construction Project Management and Performance
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.