From the History of Scientometric Citation Classifications. The First Two Works and Russophone Publications. Part 1

The apparent diversity of citation motivations and the idea of possible differences in citation functions led to the first attempts at scientometric classifications of citations as early as in the 1960s (i.e. at the dawn of the appearance of a toolkit called the Science Citation Index). These classifications were developed based on the assumption that their application would make it possible to obtain more accurate data on both characteristics of cited documents and the very nature of scientific citation. They were also supposed to help refine information retrieval. The creation of such classifications is considered here in the context of the need for a correct understanding of the reflection of the properties of scientific documents by their citedness. In this work, the two very first articles on this topic are analyzed. Therefore, they contain the first proposed scientometric citation classifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science management theory and practice
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.4.8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the History of Scientometric Citation Classifications. The First Two Works and Russophone Publications. Part 1

В. С. Лазарев
2 citations
Science management theory and practice
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
0.92
article

From the History of Scientometric Citation Classifications. The First Two Works and Russophone Publications. Part 1

В. С. Лазарев
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The apparent diversity of citation motivations and the idea of possible differences in citation functions led to the first attempts at scientometric classifications of citations as early as in the 1960s (i.e. at the dawn of the appearance of a toolkit called the Science Citation Index). These classifications were developed based on the assumption that their application would make it possible to obtain more accurate data on both characteristics of cited documents and the very nature of scientific citation. They were also supposed to help refine information retrieval. The creation of such classifications is considered here in the context of the need for a correct understanding of the reflection of the properties of scientific documents by their citedness. In this work, the two very first articles on this topic are analyzed. Therefore, they contain the first proposed scientometric citation classifications.

Science management theory and practiceVol. 6(4)
Belarusian National Technical University (BY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.