Estimating Biomass Carbon Stocks of Inner Mongolia Grasslands Using Multi-Source Data

Accurate estimates of biomass C stocks of grasslands are crucial for grassland management and climate change mitigation efforts. Here, we estimated the mean C stocks of grasslands in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR), China, in 2020 at a 10 m spatial resolution by combining multi-source data, including remote sensing, climate, topography, soil properties, and field surveys. We used the random forest model to estimate the aboveground biomass (AGB) of grasslands, achieving an R2 value of 0.83. We established a relationship between belowground biomass (BGB) and AGB using a power function based on field data, which allows us to estimate the BGB of grasslands from our AGB estimate. We estimated the mean AGB across IMAR to be 100.7 g m−2, with a total value of 1.4 × 108 t. The BGB of grasslands is much higher than AGB, with mean and total values of 526.0 g m−2 and 7.4 × 108 t, respectively. Consequently, our C stock estimates show that IMAR grasslands store significantly more C in their BGB (332.6 Tg C) compared to AGB (63.7 Tg C). Random forest model analyses suggested that remotely sensed vegetation indices and soil moisture are the most important predictors for estimating the AGB of grasslands in the IMAR. We highlight the important role of BGB for the C store in the Inner Mongolia grasslands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010029
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Biomass Carbon Stocks of Inner Mongolia Grasslands Using Multi-Source Data

Haibo Dong, Shaobo Sun, Kai Liu, Xufeng Wang et al.
4 citations
Remote Sensing
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
2.84
article

Estimating Biomass Carbon Stocks of Inner Mongolia Grasslands Using Multi-Source Data

Haibo Dong, Shaobo Sun, Kai Liu, Xufeng Wang, Xiaolei Yang, Yong Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accurate estimates of biomass C stocks of grasslands are crucial for grassland management and climate change mitigation efforts. Here, we estimated the mean C stocks of grasslands in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR), China, in 2020 at a 10 m spatial resolution by combining multi-source data, including remote sensing, climate, topography, soil properties, and field surveys. We used the random forest model to estimate the aboveground biomass (AGB) of grasslands, achieving an R2 value of 0.83. We established a relationship between belowground biomass (BGB) and AGB using a power function based on field data, which allows us to estimate the BGB of grasslands from our AGB estimate. We estimated the mean AGB across IMAR to be 100.7 g m−2, with a total value of 1.4 × 108 t. The BGB of grasslands is much higher than AGB, with mean and total values of 526.0 g m−2 and 7.4 × 108 t, respectively. Consequently, our C stock estimates show that IMAR grasslands store significantly more C in their BGB (332.6 Tg C) compared to AGB (63.7 Tg C). Random forest model analyses suggested that remotely sensed vegetation indices and soil moisture are the most important predictors for estimating the AGB of grasslands in the IMAR. We highlight the important role of BGB for the C store in the Inner Mongolia grasslands.

Remote SensingVol. 17(1)
Tianjin University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources (CN), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.