New Materialism(s) and Systemic Psychotherapy: Does it Matter? (PART 2)

Abstract This is the second of a two‐part paper on New Materialisms (NMs) and systemic psychotherapy. The paper applies NMs concepts to the practice of systemic psychotherapy through the use of two composite practice examples. Continuing from the first part of the two‐part paper, we move the theoretical discussion from a conceptual to a practical level. Therefore, this paper aims to address some of the core elements of NMs and their relevance in systemic psychotherapy practice. It does not claim to take an exhaustive approach to implementing NMs in systemic psychotherapy. NMs can influence a new paradigm within the plurality of paradigms present in systemic psychotherapy. By and large, although NMs and systemic psychotherapy depart from different philosophical, ontological and epistemological underpinnings, we argue that they can be bridged not only at a theoretical but also at a practical level, as they both share a common potentiality as practices of freedom. By plugging in these two practices, new possibilities when it comes to understanding and creating change in our lives and the social situations in which we are situated unfold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Therapy
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12480
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Materialism(s) and Systemic Psychotherapy: Does it Matter? (PART 2)

Nasif Nijabat, F Albertini, J. Christiansen, Christopher Loh
3 citations
Journal of Family Therapy
Complex Systems and Decision Making
1.47
article

New Materialism(s) and Systemic Psychotherapy: Does it Matter? (PART 2)

Nasif Nijabat, F Albertini, J. Christiansen, Christopher Loh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This is the second of a two‐part paper on New Materialisms (NMs) and systemic psychotherapy. The paper applies NMs concepts to the practice of systemic psychotherapy through the use of two composite practice examples. Continuing from the first part of the two‐part paper, we move the theoretical discussion from a conceptual to a practical level. Therefore, this paper aims to address some of the core elements of NMs and their relevance in systemic psychotherapy practice. It does not claim to take an exhaustive approach to implementing NMs in systemic psychotherapy. NMs can influence a new paradigm within the plurality of paradigms present in systemic psychotherapy. By and large, although NMs and systemic psychotherapy depart from different philosophical, ontological and epistemological underpinnings, we argue that they can be bridged not only at a theoretical but also at a practical level, as they both share a common potentiality as practices of freedom. By plugging in these two practices, new possibilities when it comes to understanding and creating change in our lives and the social situations in which we are situated unfold.

Journal of Family TherapyVol. 47(1)
University of Essex (GB), The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King's College London (GB), North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New Materialism(s) and Systemic Psychotherapy: Does it Matter? (PART 2) — Nasif Nijabat, F Albertini, et al. · Journal of Family Therapy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS