EXPLORING THE RELEVANCE OF TWO-PART MODELS IN INNOVATION RESEARCH: TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF INNOVATION SALES

In empirical studies, firms’ innovation is often measured as the proportion of sales that can be attributed to new products or services. In a review of 20 years of research on innovation, we find this variable to be used in 141 studies providing a useful common ground to compare and contrast findings. We argue that two-part models are attractive when modelling innovation as they separate the decision to innovate from the amount of sales generated by innovation. Our review shows that only a minority of studies employ two-part models, most often in sub-optimal ways. We develop a two-part modelling framework that is suitable for innovation research and different from the conventional methods prevalent in econometrics. Furthermore, we provide a worked example of how it can be implemented. This paper contributes new knowledge about two-part models for innovation research and hopes to lay the ground for new theorising in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovation Management
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919625500070
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLORING THE RELEVANCE OF TWO-PART MODELS IN INNOVATION RESEARCH: TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF INNOVATION SALES

Anders Ryom Villadsen, Jesper Wulff, Camille Pedersen
International Journal of Innovation Management
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

EXPLORING THE RELEVANCE OF TWO-PART MODELS IN INNOVATION RESEARCH: TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF INNOVATION SALES

Anders Ryom Villadsen, Jesper Wulff, Camille Pedersen
article en

Abstract

In empirical studies, firms’ innovation is often measured as the proportion of sales that can be attributed to new products or services. In a review of 20 years of research on innovation, we find this variable to be used in 141 studies providing a useful common ground to compare and contrast findings. We argue that two-part models are attractive when modelling innovation as they separate the decision to innovate from the amount of sales generated by innovation. Our review shows that only a minority of studies employ two-part models, most often in sub-optimal ways. We develop a two-part modelling framework that is suitable for innovation research and different from the conventional methods prevalent in econometrics. Furthermore, we provide a worked example of how it can be implemented. This paper contributes new knowledge about two-part models for innovation research and hopes to lay the ground for new theorising in the future.

International Journal of Innovation ManagementVol. 29(01n02)
Aarhus University (DK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.