Soldiers and Autocratization. Varieties of Military Roles in Post-Cold War Asia

Abstract This paper analyzes the military’s behavior in seventeen episodes of autocratization in Asia-Pacific since 1991. It presents a conceptualization of military roles in situations of autocratization. The inductive empirical analysis discusses seven variables of military behavior that combine two theoretical perspectives from existing strands of research: military-centric and society-centered explanations. We identify three forms of military behavior as empirically relevant in Asia. Each is characterized by the presence of a distinct combination of four causal factors: incumbent threats to the military’s core interests and a strong praetorian tradition (military-centered variables); and military veto power and a strong ruling party organization (society-centric factors). Other variables, such as a military background of political leaders, elite radicalization and polarized mass mobilization, and internal security and public order as established role of the military cannot account for varieties of military action in episodes of autocratization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Security Studies
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogae046
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soldiers and Autocratization. Varieties of Military Roles in Post-Cold War Asia

David Kuehn, Aurel Croissant
2 citations
Journal of Global Security Studies
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
2.26
article

Soldiers and Autocratization. Varieties of Military Roles in Post-Cold War Asia

David Kuehn, Aurel Croissant
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the military’s behavior in seventeen episodes of autocratization in Asia-Pacific since 1991. It presents a conceptualization of military roles in situations of autocratization. The inductive empirical analysis discusses seven variables of military behavior that combine two theoretical perspectives from existing strands of research: military-centric and society-centered explanations. We identify three forms of military behavior as empirically relevant in Asia. Each is characterized by the presence of a distinct combination of four causal factors: incumbent threats to the military’s core interests and a strong praetorian tradition (military-centered variables); and military veto power and a strong ruling party organization (society-centric factors). Other variables, such as a military background of political leaders, elite radicalization and polarized mass mobilization, and internal security and public order as established role of the military cannot account for varieties of military action in episodes of autocratization.

Journal of Global Security StudiesVol. 9(4)
Heidelberg University (DE), Ewha Womans University Medical Center (KR), Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Soldiers and Autocratization. Varieties of Military Roles in Post-Cold War Asia — David Kuehn, Aurel Croissant · Journal of Global Security Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS