Enablers of and barriers to knowledge management in medium-sized professional service firms

The literature on enablers of and barriers to knowledge management (KM) adopts a black-or-white approach, as a factor is an enabler of or a barrier to KM, generates its effects in a specific stage of the KM process only, and operates separately from other factors. Researchers advise firms that leveraging enablers and limiting barriers is the best strategy for designing effective KM systems. We challenge this advice and the black-or-white approach by presenting a case study about a medium-sized professional service firm. We demonstrate that some factors have a dual nature and influence different stages of the KM process, as they push the generation of new knowledge but hinder its sharing. Hence, firms eliminating barriers to KM sharing also risk removing enablers of it. Moreover, we show that new knowledge arises not to support a company’s performance but to defend employees’ organisational position, questioning the rationale behind designing KM systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Management Research & Practice
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2024.2443984
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enablers of and barriers to knowledge management in medium-sized professional service firms

John Dumay, Elena Scarpino, Giuseppe Marzo
3 citations
Knowledge Management Research & Practice
Knowledge Management and Sharing
2.87
article

Enablers of and barriers to knowledge management in medium-sized professional service firms

John Dumay, Elena Scarpino, Giuseppe Marzo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The literature on enablers of and barriers to knowledge management (KM) adopts a black-or-white approach, as a factor is an enabler of or a barrier to KM, generates its effects in a specific stage of the KM process only, and operates separately from other factors. Researchers advise firms that leveraging enablers and limiting barriers is the best strategy for designing effective KM systems. We challenge this advice and the black-or-white approach by presenting a case study about a medium-sized professional service firm. We demonstrate that some factors have a dual nature and influence different stages of the KM process, as they push the generation of new knowledge but hinder its sharing. Hence, firms eliminating barriers to KM sharing also risk removing enablers of it. Moreover, we show that new knowledge arises not to support a company’s performance but to defend employees’ organisational position, questioning the rationale behind designing KM systems.

Knowledge Management Research & PracticeVol. 23(3)
IDEO (United States) (US), University of Ferrara (IT), Nyenrode Business University (NL), Aalborg University (DK), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.