Sustainable waste management strategies for earthquake debris: Lessons from the 2008 China and 2023 Türkiye-Syria disasters

Disasters like earthquakes produce immense debris, posing long-term environmental, economic and health risks if not managed properly. While earthquake-induced waste management has been studied in certain contexts, there is limited understanding of how distinct approaches, especially when considering the sustainability framework, impact recovery outcomes. This study addresses this gap by comparing the debris management strategies of the 2008 Sichuan and 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquakes. Using life cycle analysis, it evaluates debris composition, carbon emission, eco-costs, and recycling and recovery practices. The results reveal the Sichuan earthquake produced waste with an eco-cost of €24.58 billion and 152.5 million tons of CO 2 equivalents, while the Türkiye-Syria earthquake yielded €9.08 billion in eco-cost and 60.3 million tons of CO 2 equivalents. The findings underscore the critical role of resilient construction practices, establishment of national waste management standards, and recycling-focused recovery efforts in mitigating the impact of earthquakes on communities and ecosystems. This study offers a pioneering framework for the comparative analysis of seismic waste management, providing actionable insights for stakeholders to develop disaster recovery strategies and improve waste management practices in earthquake-prone regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105153
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable waste management strategies for earthquake debris: Lessons from the 2008 China and 2023 Türkiye-Syria disasters

Zhang Jingjie, Nurullah Bektaş
8 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
5.68
article

Sustainable waste management strategies for earthquake debris: Lessons from the 2008 China and 2023 Türkiye-Syria disasters

Zhang Jingjie, Nurullah Bektaş
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Disasters like earthquakes produce immense debris, posing long-term environmental, economic and health risks if not managed properly. While earthquake-induced waste management has been studied in certain contexts, there is limited understanding of how distinct approaches, especially when considering the sustainability framework, impact recovery outcomes. This study addresses this gap by comparing the debris management strategies of the 2008 Sichuan and 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquakes. Using life cycle analysis, it evaluates debris composition, carbon emission, eco-costs, and recycling and recovery practices. The results reveal the Sichuan earthquake produced waste with an eco-cost of €24.58 billion and 152.5 million tons of CO 2 equivalents, while the Türkiye-Syria earthquake yielded €9.08 billion in eco-cost and 60.3 million tons of CO 2 equivalents. The findings underscore the critical role of resilient construction practices, establishment of national waste management standards, and recycling-focused recovery efforts in mitigating the impact of earthquakes on communities and ecosystems. This study offers a pioneering framework for the comparative analysis of seismic waste management, providing actionable insights for stakeholders to develop disaster recovery strategies and improve waste management practices in earthquake-prone regions.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 116
Széchenyi István University (HU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
5.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.