A Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Methods for Short-Term Load Forecasting

Forecasting electricity load is essential to the effective administration and functioning of power systems. This paper investigates the efficacy of various ensemble methods in Short-Term Load Forecasting (STLF) using a real-world dataset. We explore the implementation and comparative performance of four advanced ensemble models: Random Forest (RF) with Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), RF with XGBoost (XGB), XGB with ETR, and a Voting Regressor combining all aforementioned models. Our study focuses on developing these models, preprocessing data, and meticulously tuning parameters to optimize forecasting accuracy and robustness. The models are evaluated using different precision matrices such as R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The Voting Regressor model exhibited the best performance in this work, as indicated by their low RMSE and MAE values and high R2 scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/peeiacon63629.2024.10800695
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Methods for Short-Term Load Forecasting

Ankita Das, Nur Mohammad, Meher Nigar
2 citations
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.42
article

A Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Methods for Short-Term Load Forecasting

Ankita Das, Nur Mohammad, Meher Nigar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Forecasting electricity load is essential to the effective administration and functioning of power systems. This paper investigates the efficacy of various ensemble methods in Short-Term Load Forecasting (STLF) using a real-world dataset. We explore the implementation and comparative performance of four advanced ensemble models: Random Forest (RF) with Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), RF with XGBoost (XGB), XGB with ETR, and a Voting Regressor combining all aforementioned models. Our study focuses on developing these models, preprocessing data, and meticulously tuning parameters to optimize forecasting accuracy and robustness. The models are evaluated using different precision matrices such as R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The Voting Regressor model exhibited the best performance in this work, as indicated by their low RMSE and MAE values and high R2 scores.

Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (BD)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Methods for Short-Term Load Forecasting — Ankita Das, Nur Mohammad, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS