Making responsible research and innovation meaningful in citizen science

Abstract This study aims to explore what aspects of citizen science (CS) make the involvement of researchers (implementing CS projects) meaningful in terms of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) principles. Using constructivist grounded theory, we analysed semi-structured interviews conducted with 20 CS projects in terms of sensemaking and sensegiving. In terms of sensemaking, researchers of CS projects tend to implicitly self-incorporate RRI principles into work and among these principles, public engagement and inclusion are key aspects motivating researchers into CS projects. In terms of sensegiving, researchers prioritize open access and science education over other RRI principles. The lack of acknowledgment of RRI’s importance in the current research culture proves to be a significant barrier to implementing these principles in a sustained manner. Likewise, experiential learning was widely practised; however, CS projects encountered different concerns and dilemmas. Therefore, tailored training on RRI is necessary for researchers involved in CS projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae078
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making responsible research and innovation meaningful in citizen science

Eglė Butkevičienė, Loreta Tauginienė, Snežana Popov, Francesca Ugolini et al.
2 citations
Science and Public Policy
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
1.46
article

Making responsible research and innovation meaningful in citizen science

Eglė Butkevičienė, Loreta Tauginienė, Snežana Popov, Francesca Ugolini, Barbara Heinisch, Luciano Massetti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to explore what aspects of citizen science (CS) make the involvement of researchers (implementing CS projects) meaningful in terms of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) principles. Using constructivist grounded theory, we analysed semi-structured interviews conducted with 20 CS projects in terms of sensemaking and sensegiving. In terms of sensemaking, researchers of CS projects tend to implicitly self-incorporate RRI principles into work and among these principles, public engagement and inclusion are key aspects motivating researchers into CS projects. In terms of sensegiving, researchers prioritize open access and science education over other RRI principles. The lack of acknowledgment of RRI’s importance in the current research culture proves to be a significant barrier to implementing these principles in a sustained manner. Likewise, experiential learning was widely practised; however, CS projects encountered different concerns and dilemmas. Therefore, tailored training on RRI is necessary for researchers involved in CS projects.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 52(3)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Novi Sad (RS), Kaunas University of Technology (LT), National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US), Hanken School of Economics (FI)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.