Enhancing PV Forecasting Accuracy through Optimal Clustering Method Selection and Impact Assessment

This study investigates the impact of clustering on photovoltaic (PV) power prediction by utilizing two openly accessible datasets obtained from an Australian Microgrid. It evaluates the performance of five popular clustering algorithms—KMeans, DBScan, Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Spectral Clustering (SC), and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)—by comparing their accuracy through metrics such as the Calinski-Harabasz (CH) Score, Davies-Bouldin (DB) Score, and Silhouette Score (SS). Additionally, the research examines two deep-learning models to assess how clustering influences forecasting accuracy. Performance metrics including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), R-squared (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>) score, and Standard Deviation of Error (SDE) are used to compare the results of clustered versus non-clustered data. The findings suggest that clustering improves forecasting performance, with the most effective clustering method providing the best overall predictions, highlighting it as the most optimal approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aupec62273.2024.10807587
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing PV Forecasting Accuracy through Optimal Clustering Method Selection and Impact Assessment

M. J. Hossain, Md. Ahasan Habib
1 citations
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
0.35
article

Enhancing PV Forecasting Accuracy through Optimal Clustering Method Selection and Impact Assessment

M. J. Hossain, Md. Ahasan Habib
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of clustering on photovoltaic (PV) power prediction by utilizing two openly accessible datasets obtained from an Australian Microgrid. It evaluates the performance of five popular clustering algorithms—KMeans, DBScan, Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Spectral Clustering (SC), and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)—by comparing their accuracy through metrics such as the Calinski-Harabasz (CH) Score, Davies-Bouldin (DB) Score, and Silhouette Score (SS). Additionally, the research examines two deep-learning models to assess how clustering influences forecasting accuracy. Performance metrics including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), R-squared (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>) score, and Standard Deviation of Error (SDE) are used to compare the results of clustered versus non-clustered data. The findings suggest that clustering improves forecasting performance, with the most effective clustering method providing the best overall predictions, highlighting it as the most optimal approach.

University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.