LeGo-Drive: Language-enhanced Goal-oriented Closed-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) produce long-term trajectory waypoints or directly control actions based on their perception input and language prompt. However, these VLMs are not explicitly aware of the constraints imposed by the scene or kinematics of the vehicle. As a result, the generated trajectories or control inputs are likely to be unsafe and/or infeasible. In this paper, we introduce LeGo-Drive<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">†</sup>, which aims to address these issues. Our key idea is to use the VLM to just predict a goal location based on the given language command and perception input, which is then fed to a downstream differentiable trajectory optimizer with learnable components. We train the VLM and the trajectory optimizer in an end-to-end fashion using a loss function that captures the ego-vehicle’s ability to reach the predicted goal while satisfying safety and kinematic constraints. The gradients during the back-propagation flow through the optimization layer and make the VLM aware of the planner’s capabilities, making more feasible goal predictions. We compare our end-to-end approach with a decoupled framework where the planner is just used at the inference time to drive to the VLM-predicted goal location and report a goal reaching Success Rate of 81%. We demonstrate the versatility of LeGo-Drive<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">†</sup> across various driving scenarios and navigation commands, highlighting its potential for practical deployment in autonomous vehicles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801870
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LeGo-Drive: Language-enhanced Goal-oriented Closed-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving

K. Madhava Krishna, Arun Kumar Singh, Pranjal Paul, Tushar Choudhary et al.
4 citations
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.81
article

LeGo-Drive: Language-enhanced Goal-oriented Closed-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving

K. Madhava Krishna, Arun Kumar Singh, Pranjal Paul, Tushar Choudhary, Anant Garg
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) produce long-term trajectory waypoints or directly control actions based on their perception input and language prompt. However, these VLMs are not explicitly aware of the constraints imposed by the scene or kinematics of the vehicle. As a result, the generated trajectories or control inputs are likely to be unsafe and/or infeasible. In this paper, we introduce LeGo-Drive<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">†</sup>, which aims to address these issues. Our key idea is to use the VLM to just predict a goal location based on the given language command and perception input, which is then fed to a downstream differentiable trajectory optimizer with learnable components. We train the VLM and the trajectory optimizer in an end-to-end fashion using a loss function that captures the ego-vehicle’s ability to reach the predicted goal while satisfying safety and kinematic constraints. The gradients during the back-propagation flow through the optimization layer and make the VLM aware of the planner’s capabilities, making more feasible goal predictions. We compare our end-to-end approach with a decoupled framework where the planner is just used at the inference time to drive to the VLM-predicted goal location and report a goal reaching Success Rate of 81%. We demonstrate the versatility of LeGo-Drive<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">†</sup> across various driving scenarios and navigation commands, highlighting its potential for practical deployment in autonomous vehicles.

University of Tartu (EE), Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.