Tinjauan Yuridis Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online

The purpose of this writing is to be able to review and analyze electronic information evidence of criminal acts of online fraud from the perspective of criminal procedural law in Indonesia. The method used in this writing is to use a normative juridical method approach. The problems discussed in this paper are how electronic evidence is used to prove criminal acts of fraud through online media and how electronic evidence is used for online fraud crimes based on Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and electronic transactions, therefore the judge's task in his authority as a law enforcer is to interpret or interpret electronic evidence as an extension of documentary evidence or instructions which are valid evidence according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as regulated in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2) Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which regulates evidence, namely electronic information, electronic documents and printouts, as valid evidence and the expansion of evidence in criminal procedural law relating to acts criminal penalties regulated in the electronic information and transactions law. Apart from that, to assist in interpreting and interpreting electronic evidence, judges need expert testimony in the evidentiary process. So, electronic information evidence is an extension of expert testimony and guidance evidence in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, expansion of legal evidence based on criminal procedural law. Furthermore, in Article 5 paragraph (3) of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, through a negative legal proof system, that proof is not based only on legal regulations, but also on the judge's belief, so the judge also needs expert information to find out the real facts regarding electronic evidence, p. This relates to article 1 points 1 and 4 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARBITER Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v6i2.5343
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online

Nanang Tomi Sitorus, Rafiqi Rafiqi, Zulkifli Anwar Siregar
ARBITER Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online

Nanang Tomi Sitorus, Rafiqi Rafiqi, Zulkifli Anwar Siregar
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to be able to review and analyze electronic information evidence of criminal acts of online fraud from the perspective of criminal procedural law in Indonesia. The method used in this writing is to use a normative juridical method approach. The problems discussed in this paper are how electronic evidence is used to prove criminal acts of fraud through online media and how electronic evidence is used for online fraud crimes based on Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and electronic transactions, therefore the judge's task in his authority as a law enforcer is to interpret or interpret electronic evidence as an extension of documentary evidence or instructions which are valid evidence according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as regulated in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2) Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which regulates evidence, namely electronic information, electronic documents and printouts, as valid evidence and the expansion of evidence in criminal procedural law relating to acts criminal penalties regulated in the electronic information and transactions law. Apart from that, to assist in interpreting and interpreting electronic evidence, judges need expert testimony in the evidentiary process. So, electronic information evidence is an extension of expert testimony and guidance evidence in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, expansion of legal evidence based on criminal procedural law. Furthermore, in Article 5 paragraph (3) of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, through a negative legal proof system, that proof is not based only on legal regulations, but also on the judge's belief, so the judge also needs expert information to find out the real facts regarding electronic evidence, p. This relates to article 1 points 1 and 4 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions.

ARBITER Jurnal Ilmiah Magister HukumVol. 6(2)
Medan Area University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.