Rwandan Farmers’ Perceptions of the Acoustic Environment and the Potential for Acoustic Monitoring

Monitoring the farm acoustic environment can provide important information about processes affecting crop production. This paper assesses farmers’ knowledge and attitudes toward acoustic technology for farm monitoring in Rwanda. Stratified random sampling was used to select 430 farmers from 3 sectors. Demographic, farm, and technical knowledge data were collected from farmers with a survey. Cross-tabulation results show farmers with secondary and university education are more interested in acoustic technology than those with a primary education and farmers engaged in commercial farming are more interested in technology for monitoring acoustic sources than subsistence farmers. However, nearly all farmers are willing to deploy a listening technology to monitor the acoustic environment. Farmers have a clear priority to listen to animals on the farm, whether they are pests (specifically, birds) or livestock. A chi-square test of independence indicates a significant relationship between farmers’ consideration of technology for farm monitoring and their attitudes toward sound monitoring. Farmers want a technological solution, but demand that the solution be low-cost and provide a simple alert. The results inform system requirements for an Internet of Things acoustic network that can deliver this information to the farmer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15010025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rwandan Farmers’ Perceptions of the Acoustic Environment and the Potential for Acoustic Monitoring

Destiny Kwabla Amenyedzi, Frederic Nzanywayingoma, Anthony Vodacek, Peace Bamurigire et al.
2 citations
Agriculture
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
1.02
article

Rwandan Farmers’ Perceptions of the Acoustic Environment and the Potential for Acoustic Monitoring

Destiny Kwabla Amenyedzi, Frederic Nzanywayingoma, Anthony Vodacek, Peace Bamurigire, Emmanuel Ndashimye, Philibert Nsengiyumva, Micheline Kazeneza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Monitoring the farm acoustic environment can provide important information about processes affecting crop production. This paper assesses farmers’ knowledge and attitudes toward acoustic technology for farm monitoring in Rwanda. Stratified random sampling was used to select 430 farmers from 3 sectors. Demographic, farm, and technical knowledge data were collected from farmers with a survey. Cross-tabulation results show farmers with secondary and university education are more interested in acoustic technology than those with a primary education and farmers engaged in commercial farming are more interested in technology for monitoring acoustic sources than subsistence farmers. However, nearly all farmers are willing to deploy a listening technology to monitor the acoustic environment. Farmers have a clear priority to listen to animals on the farm, whether they are pests (specifically, birds) or livestock. A chi-square test of independence indicates a significant relationship between farmers’ consideration of technology for farm monitoring and their attitudes toward sound monitoring. Farmers want a technological solution, but demand that the solution be low-cost and provide a simple alert. The results inform system requirements for an Internet of Things acoustic network that can deliver this information to the farmer.

AgricultureVol. 15(1)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of Rwanda (RW), Carnegie Mellon University Africa (RW)
University of Rwanda
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.