Evaluating Photosynthetic Light Response Models for Leaf Photosynthetic Traits in Paddy Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Field Conditions

Accurate photosynthetic parameters obtained from photosynthetic light-response curves (LRCs) are crucial for enhancing our comprehension of plant photosynthesis. However, the task of fitting LRCs is still demanding due to diverse variations in LRCs under different environmental conditions, as previous models were evaluated based on a limited number of leaf traits and a small number of LRCs. This study aimed to compare the performance of nine LRC models in fitting a set of 108 LRCs measured from paddy rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) grown in field across 3 years under different leaf positions, leaf ages, nitrogen levels, irrigation levels, and varieties. The shape of 108 LRCs varies significantly under a range of leaf traits, which can be typed into three leaf light-acclimation types-high-light leaves (HL-1 and HL-2), and low-light leaves (LL). The accuracy of these models was evaluated by (1) LRCs from three acclimation types: HL-1 and HL-2, and LL; and (2) LRCs across three irradiance stages: light-limited, light-saturated, and photoinhibition. Results indicate that the Ye model emerged as the top performance among the nine models, particularly in the photoinhibition stage of LL leaves, with median values of <i>R<sup>2</sup></i>, <i>SSE</i>, and <i>AIC</i> of 0.99, 2.39, and -14.03, respectively. Furthermore, the Ye model produced the most accurate predictions of key photosynthetic parameters, including dark respiration (<i>R<sub>D</sub></i>), light-compensation point (<i>I<sub>comp</sub></i>), maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>P<sub>Nma</sub></i><sub>x</sub>), and light-saturation point (<i>I<sub>sat</sub></i>). Results also suggest that <i>P<sub>NImax</sub></i> and <i>I<sub>max</sub></i> were the most appropriate parameters to describe photosynthetic activity at the light-saturation point. These findings have significant implications for improving the accuracy of fitting LRCs, and thus robust predictions of photosynthetic parameters in rice under different environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010023
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Photosynthetic Light Response Models for Leaf Photosynthetic Traits in Paddy Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Field Conditions

Huifeng Sun, Sheng Zhou, Linyi Li, Xinfeng Yao
2 citations
Plants
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
0.92
article

Evaluating Photosynthetic Light Response Models for Leaf Photosynthetic Traits in Paddy Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under Field Conditions

Huifeng Sun, Sheng Zhou, Linyi Li, Xinfeng Yao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate photosynthetic parameters obtained from photosynthetic light-response curves (LRCs) are crucial for enhancing our comprehension of plant photosynthesis. However, the task of fitting LRCs is still demanding due to diverse variations in LRCs under different environmental conditions, as previous models were evaluated based on a limited number of leaf traits and a small number of LRCs. This study aimed to compare the performance of nine LRC models in fitting a set of 108 LRCs measured from paddy rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) grown in field across 3 years under different leaf positions, leaf ages, nitrogen levels, irrigation levels, and varieties. The shape of 108 LRCs varies significantly under a range of leaf traits, which can be typed into three leaf light-acclimation types-high-light leaves (HL-1 and HL-2), and low-light leaves (LL). The accuracy of these models was evaluated by (1) LRCs from three acclimation types: HL-1 and HL-2, and LL; and (2) LRCs across three irradiance stages: light-limited, light-saturated, and photoinhibition. Results indicate that the Ye model emerged as the top performance among the nine models, particularly in the photoinhibition stage of LL leaves, with median values of <i>R<sup>2</sup></i>, <i>SSE</i>, and <i>AIC</i> of 0.99, 2.39, and -14.03, respectively. Furthermore, the Ye model produced the most accurate predictions of key photosynthetic parameters, including dark respiration (<i>R<sub>D</sub></i>), light-compensation point (<i>I<sub>comp</sub></i>), maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>P<sub>Nma</sub></i><sub>x</sub>), and light-saturation point (<i>I<sub>sat</sub></i>). Results also suggest that <i>P<sub>NImax</sub></i> and <i>I<sub>max</sub></i> were the most appropriate parameters to describe photosynthetic activity at the light-saturation point. These findings have significant implications for improving the accuracy of fitting LRCs, and thus robust predictions of photosynthetic parameters in rice under different environmental conditions.

PlantsVol. 14(1)
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.