Deep Learning for Melanoma Detection: A Deep Learning Approach to Differentiating Malignant Melanoma from Benign Melanocytic Nevi

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Melanoma, an aggressive form of skin cancer, accounts for a significant proportion of skin-cancer-related deaths worldwide. Early and accurate differentiation between melanoma and benign melanocytic nevi is critical for improving survival rates but remains challenging because of diagnostic variability. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise in automating melanoma detection with accuracy comparable to expert dermatologists. This study evaluates and compares the performance of four CNN architectures-DenseNet121, ResNet50V2, NASNetMobile, and MobileNetV2-for the binary classification of dermoscopic images. <b>Methods</b>: A dataset of 8825 dermoscopic images from DermNet was standardized and divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) subsets. Image augmentation techniques were applied to enhance model generalizability. The CNN architectures were pre-trained on ImageNet and customized for binary classification. Models were trained using the Adam optimizer and evaluated based on accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), inference time, and model size. The statistical significance of the differences was assessed using McNemar's test. <b>Results</b>: DenseNet121 achieved the highest accuracy (92.30%) and an AUC of 0.951, while ResNet50V2 recorded the highest AUC (0.957). MobileNetV2 combined efficiency with competitive performance, achieving a 92.19% accuracy, the smallest model size (9.89 MB), and the fastest inference time (23.46 ms). NASNetMobile, despite its compact size, had a slower inference time (108.67 ms), and slightly lower accuracy (90.94%). Performance differences among the models were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: DenseNet121 demonstrated a superior diagnostic performance, while MobileNetV2 provided the most efficient solution for deployment in resource-constrained settings. The CNNs show substantial potential for improving melanoma detection in clinical and mobile applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17010028
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning for Melanoma Detection: A Deep Learning Approach to Differentiating Malignant Melanoma from Benign Melanocytic Nevi

Georgios Feretzakis, Αθανάσιος Αναστασίου, Magdalini Kreouzi, Evgenia Paxinou et al.
14 citations
Cancers
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
3.96
article

Deep Learning for Melanoma Detection: A Deep Learning Approach to Differentiating Malignant Melanoma from Benign Melanocytic Nevi

Georgios Feretzakis, Αθανάσιος Αναστασίου, Magdalini Kreouzi, Evgenia Paxinou, Nikolaos Theodorakis, Maria Nikolaou, Dimitris Kalles, Vassilios S. Verykios, Aikaterini Sakagianni
article en
14 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Melanoma, an aggressive form of skin cancer, accounts for a significant proportion of skin-cancer-related deaths worldwide. Early and accurate differentiation between melanoma and benign melanocytic nevi is critical for improving survival rates but remains challenging because of diagnostic variability. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise in automating melanoma detection with accuracy comparable to expert dermatologists. This study evaluates and compares the performance of four CNN architectures-DenseNet121, ResNet50V2, NASNetMobile, and MobileNetV2-for the binary classification of dermoscopic images. <b>Methods</b>: A dataset of 8825 dermoscopic images from DermNet was standardized and divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and testing (10%) subsets. Image augmentation techniques were applied to enhance model generalizability. The CNN architectures were pre-trained on ImageNet and customized for binary classification. Models were trained using the Adam optimizer and evaluated based on accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), inference time, and model size. The statistical significance of the differences was assessed using McNemar's test. <b>Results</b>: DenseNet121 achieved the highest accuracy (92.30%) and an AUC of 0.951, while ResNet50V2 recorded the highest AUC (0.957). MobileNetV2 combined efficiency with competitive performance, achieving a 92.19% accuracy, the smallest model size (9.89 MB), and the fastest inference time (23.46 ms). NASNetMobile, despite its compact size, had a slower inference time (108.67 ms), and slightly lower accuracy (90.94%). Performance differences among the models were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: DenseNet121 demonstrated a superior diagnostic performance, while MobileNetV2 provided the most efficient solution for deployment in resource-constrained settings. The CNNs show substantial potential for improving melanoma detection in clinical and mobile applications.

CancersVol. 17(1)
National Technical University of Athens (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hellenic Open University (GR), Sismanoglio General Hospital (GR), Simanogleio-Amalia Fleming General Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
3.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.