Exposure/Risk Assessment of Employees in Gasoline Refueling Stations with and Without the Efficacy of Vapor Recovery Systems in Mexico

Concerns regarding the health risks associated with employe exposure to volatile chemicals during gasoline refueling necessitates rigorous investigation and effective countermeasures. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of vapor recovery systems in mitigating exposure risks during gasoline refueling. Employee exposure to volatile organic compounds, aldehydes, carbon monoxide, and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) was assessed at gasoline stations with and without vapor recovery systems. Three stations each from the State of Mexico and Mexico City, equipped with gasoline vapor recovery systems, were compared with three stations in Guadalajara lacking such systems. The exposure concentrations (mean ± standard deviation) to benzene in Guadalajara, the State of Mexico, and Mexico City were 45 ± 29, 24 ± 20, and 18 ± 15 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, which were significantly higher than the background atmospheric concentrations at 1.6 ± 0.56, 0.72 ± 0.083, and 0.65 ± 0.14 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Similarly, the exposure concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes at gasoline stations were significantly higher than the background atmospheric concentrations. However, the exposure concentrations of formaldehyde and PM<sub>2.5</sub> were similar to the background atmospheric concentrations. The excess cancer risks due to benzene exposure were estimated at 1.2-4.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, 0.63-2.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, and 0.46-1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> (mean) and 0.42-1.5 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, 0.29-1.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, and 2.4-8.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> (maximum) in Guadalajara, the State of Mexico, and Mexico City, respectively. The risk to employees in gasoline stations was reduced by 47-61% in service stations with gasoline vapor recovery systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22010010
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exposure/Risk Assessment of Employees in Gasoline Refueling Stations with and Without the Efficacy of Vapor Recovery Systems in Mexico

Blanca Jiménez, Beatriz Cardenas Gonzalez, Shinji Wakamatsu, J. García et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.40
article

Exposure/Risk Assessment of Employees in Gasoline Refueling Stations with and Without the Efficacy of Vapor Recovery Systems in Mexico

Blanca Jiménez, Beatriz Cardenas Gonzalez, Shinji Wakamatsu, J. García, Naohide Shinohara, Miguel Reyes, R Cruz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Concerns regarding the health risks associated with employe exposure to volatile chemicals during gasoline refueling necessitates rigorous investigation and effective countermeasures. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of vapor recovery systems in mitigating exposure risks during gasoline refueling. Employee exposure to volatile organic compounds, aldehydes, carbon monoxide, and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) was assessed at gasoline stations with and without vapor recovery systems. Three stations each from the State of Mexico and Mexico City, equipped with gasoline vapor recovery systems, were compared with three stations in Guadalajara lacking such systems. The exposure concentrations (mean ± standard deviation) to benzene in Guadalajara, the State of Mexico, and Mexico City were 45 ± 29, 24 ± 20, and 18 ± 15 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, which were significantly higher than the background atmospheric concentrations at 1.6 ± 0.56, 0.72 ± 0.083, and 0.65 ± 0.14 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Similarly, the exposure concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes at gasoline stations were significantly higher than the background atmospheric concentrations. However, the exposure concentrations of formaldehyde and PM<sub>2.5</sub> were similar to the background atmospheric concentrations. The excess cancer risks due to benzene exposure were estimated at 1.2-4.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, 0.63-2.2 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, and 0.46-1.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> (mean) and 0.42-1.5 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, 0.29-1.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup>, and 2.4-8.6 × 10<sup>-5</sup> (maximum) in Guadalajara, the State of Mexico, and Mexico City, respectively. The risk to employees in gasoline stations was reduced by 47-61% in service stations with gasoline vapor recovery systems.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(1)
World Resources Institute (US), Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (MX), Ehime University (JP), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Japan International Cooperation Agency, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.