Examining the sensitivity of ECMWF IFS weather forecasts to sea‐ice coupling for the summer‐time Arctic and cyclones

Abstract In recent years there has been an advance towards coupled Earth‐system models for weather forecasting. For example, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts now implements ocean–ice coupling with dynamic sea ice in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) at all time ranges. This has the potential to improve weather forecasts in the polar regions, where sea ice influences the overlying atmosphere directly by turbulent exchange, especially in the rapidly warming summer‐time Arctic where thinner and more mobile ice is susceptible to rapid change. In this study, we investigate the sensitivity of IFS (cycle 47r1) weather forecasts to sea‐ice coupling representation in the summer‐time Arctic by comparing three sets of forecasts that are coupled with (i) dynamic sea ice in operational configuration, (ii) static sea ice, and (iii) dynamic sea ice with additional thermodynamic (surface temperature and albedo) coupling. It is found that dynamic sea ice improves predictions of sea ice and the ice edge compared with persistence, especially in the vicinity of Arctic cyclones. The dynamic sea‐ice forecasts exhibit lower near‐surface temperatures (up to 0.5 °C) compared with static sea‐ice forecasts where ice loss has occurred, and differences in near‐surface winds of up to 0.5 , consistent with changing surface roughness over the marginal ice zone. The forecasts with additional thermodynamic coupling have near‐surface temperatures that are up to 1 °C cooler over ice than the operational configuration (correcting a known warm bias), consistent with a more stable boundary layer (BL) and weaker near‐surface winds. The influence of sea‐ice coupling above the BL is small, with differences in cyclone forecasts being smaller than the spread of the operational ensemble. This study highlights the influence of ocean–ice coupling in weather forecasts for the summer‐time Arctic, and the potential gains from improving its representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4899
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the sensitivity of ECMWF IFS weather forecasts to sea‐ice coupling for the summer‐time Arctic and cyclones

Ben Harvey, Ambrogio Volonté, John Methven, Hannah L. Croad et al.
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Examining the sensitivity of ECMWF IFS weather forecasts to sea‐ice coupling for the summer‐time Arctic and cyclones

Ben Harvey, Ambrogio Volonté, John Methven, Hannah L. Croad, Sarah Keeley
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years there has been an advance towards coupled Earth‐system models for weather forecasting. For example, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts now implements ocean–ice coupling with dynamic sea ice in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) at all time ranges. This has the potential to improve weather forecasts in the polar regions, where sea ice influences the overlying atmosphere directly by turbulent exchange, especially in the rapidly warming summer‐time Arctic where thinner and more mobile ice is susceptible to rapid change. In this study, we investigate the sensitivity of IFS (cycle 47r1) weather forecasts to sea‐ice coupling representation in the summer‐time Arctic by comparing three sets of forecasts that are coupled with (i) dynamic sea ice in operational configuration, (ii) static sea ice, and (iii) dynamic sea ice with additional thermodynamic (surface temperature and albedo) coupling. It is found that dynamic sea ice improves predictions of sea ice and the ice edge compared with persistence, especially in the vicinity of Arctic cyclones. The dynamic sea‐ice forecasts exhibit lower near‐surface temperatures (up to 0.5 °C) compared with static sea‐ice forecasts where ice loss has occurred, and differences in near‐surface winds of up to 0.5 , consistent with changing surface roughness over the marginal ice zone. The forecasts with additional thermodynamic coupling have near‐surface temperatures that are up to 1 °C cooler over ice than the operational configuration (correcting a known warm bias), consistent with a more stable boundary layer (BL) and weaker near‐surface winds. The influence of sea‐ice coupling above the BL is small, with differences in cyclone forecasts being smaller than the spread of the operational ensemble. This study highlights the influence of ocean–ice coupling in weather forecasts for the summer‐time Arctic, and the potential gains from improving its representation.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyVol. 151(766)
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), University of Reading (GB)
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.