Reducing prejudice with counter‐stereotypical AI

Abstract Based on a review of relevant literature, we propose that the proliferation of AI with human‐like and social features presents an unprecedented opportunity to address the underlying cognitive and affective drivers of prejudice. An approach informed by the psychology of intergroup contact and prejudice reduction is necessary because current AI systems often reinforce or avoid prejudices. Against this backdrop, we outline unique opportunities for prejudice reduction through ‘synthetic’ intergroup contact, wherein consumers interact with AI products and services that counter stereotypes and serve as a ‘proxy’ members of the outgroup (i.e., counter‐stereotypical AI). In contrast to human‐human contact, humanizing and socializing AI can reduce prejudice through more repeated, direct, unavoidable, private, non‐judgmental, collaborative, and need‐satisfying contact. We illustrate the potential of synthetic intergroup contact with counter‐stereotypical AI using examples of gender stereotypes and hate speech and discuss practical considerations for implementing counter‐stereotypical AI without inadvertently perpetuating or reinforcing prejudice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consumer Psychology Review
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1102
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing prejudice with counter‐stereotypical AI

Julian De Freitas, Erik Hermann, Stefano Puntoni
9 citations
Consumer Psychology Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Reducing prejudice with counter‐stereotypical AI

Julian De Freitas, Erik Hermann, Stefano Puntoni
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Based on a review of relevant literature, we propose that the proliferation of AI with human‐like and social features presents an unprecedented opportunity to address the underlying cognitive and affective drivers of prejudice. An approach informed by the psychology of intergroup contact and prejudice reduction is necessary because current AI systems often reinforce or avoid prejudices. Against this backdrop, we outline unique opportunities for prejudice reduction through ‘synthetic’ intergroup contact, wherein consumers interact with AI products and services that counter stereotypes and serve as a ‘proxy’ members of the outgroup (i.e., counter‐stereotypical AI). In contrast to human‐human contact, humanizing and socializing AI can reduce prejudice through more repeated, direct, unavoidable, private, non‐judgmental, collaborative, and need‐satisfying contact. We illustrate the potential of synthetic intergroup contact with counter‐stereotypical AI using examples of gender stereotypes and hate speech and discuss practical considerations for implementing counter‐stereotypical AI without inadvertently perpetuating or reinforcing prejudice.

Consumer Psychology ReviewVol. 8(1)
Harvard University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), ESCP Business School (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.