A resilient disaster waste management framework for communities: Experiences from Australian industry practitioners

The recent escalation in frequency and intensity of disasters demonstrates the urgent need to manage the overwhelming amount of waste generated from these events. This study developed a resilient Disaster Waste Management (DWM) framework with six key actions and an annual DWM health check plan for industry decision-makers to build resilient communities. The DWM framework and health check plan were based on analysis of the waste management literature and semi-structured interviews with local and state government decision-makers and waste management industry practitioners in Queensland, Australia. Four key insights about the effective DWM plan emerged from a thematic analysis: 1) improve decision-maker understanding of DWM; 2) the barriers to effective DWM; 3) the range of stakeholders; and 4) six priority elements of an action plan that enable effective DWM. The Institutional theory, and PPRR (Prevention, Preparation, Response, Recovery) model were used to interpret the findings. An institutional theory perspective was offered on these findings, concluding the potential for normative, coercive and mimetic drivers to influence DWM decision makers to shape informed decision making and legitimize the transition to resilient waste management practices. • This study examines characteristics of disaster waste and barriers that limit effective disaster waste management. • It proposed a novel resilient DWM framework with six actions and an annual DWM health check plan. • This study used Institutional theory and the PPRR model to interpret the findings. • The findings guide industry decision-makers to adopt practical DWM methods and build resilient communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Waste Systems
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100197
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A resilient disaster waste management framework for communities: Experiences from Australian industry practitioners

Savindi Caldera, Cheryl Desha, Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna, Joanne McNeill et al.
1 citations
Cleaner Waste Systems
Disaster Management and Resilience
1.13
article

A resilient disaster waste management framework for communities: Experiences from Australian industry practitioners

Savindi Caldera, Cheryl Desha, Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna, Joanne McNeill, Selena Feguson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The recent escalation in frequency and intensity of disasters demonstrates the urgent need to manage the overwhelming amount of waste generated from these events. This study developed a resilient Disaster Waste Management (DWM) framework with six key actions and an annual DWM health check plan for industry decision-makers to build resilient communities. The DWM framework and health check plan were based on analysis of the waste management literature and semi-structured interviews with local and state government decision-makers and waste management industry practitioners in Queensland, Australia. Four key insights about the effective DWM plan emerged from a thematic analysis: 1) improve decision-maker understanding of DWM; 2) the barriers to effective DWM; 3) the range of stakeholders; and 4) six priority elements of an action plan that enable effective DWM. The Institutional theory, and PPRR (Prevention, Preparation, Response, Recovery) model were used to interpret the findings. An institutional theory perspective was offered on these findings, concluding the potential for normative, coercive and mimetic drivers to influence DWM decision makers to shape informed decision making and legitimize the transition to resilient waste management practices. • This study examines characteristics of disaster waste and barriers that limit effective disaster waste management. • It proposed a novel resilient DWM framework with six actions and an annual DWM health check plan. • This study used Institutional theory and the PPRR model to interpret the findings. • The findings guide industry decision-makers to adopt practical DWM methods and build resilient communities.

Cleaner Waste SystemsVol. 10
Griffith University (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Disaster Management and Resilience
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.