Rewriting and Copyright Law: A Literary and Legal Analysis

Abstract In narrative literature, phrases, characters and plot elements frequently cross borders, moving from one text to another. In doing so they establish intertextual relations, including those particularly strong ones for which postcolonial and feminist literary theory have coined the term rewriting. This practice of ‘writing back to’ or rewriting existing works of literature is particularly significant as a means of expression for marginalized groups whose perspectives are missing from the pre-texts. Consequently, intertextual friction and a stance of resistance often mark the relationship between rewritings and their pre-texts. The focus of our multidisciplinary paper is to analyze the implications of rewriting for EU copyright law. Rewritings are contextualized on the continuum between infringing adaptation and free use outside the scope of protection. Copyright law faces the dilemma that it should reward the creative power of the pre-text’s author, while not stifling the creative power expressed in rewriting. We evoke a responsibility for copyright law to enable rewriting and assess potential strategies of how copyright law can meet this responsibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GRUR International
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikae155
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rewriting and Copyright Law: A Literary and Legal Analysis

Carl Gollnast, Paul Gollnast, Franziska Rauh
GRUR International
Law in Society and Culture
article

Rewriting and Copyright Law: A Literary and Legal Analysis

Carl Gollnast, Paul Gollnast, Franziska Rauh
article en

Abstract

Abstract In narrative literature, phrases, characters and plot elements frequently cross borders, moving from one text to another. In doing so they establish intertextual relations, including those particularly strong ones for which postcolonial and feminist literary theory have coined the term rewriting. This practice of ‘writing back to’ or rewriting existing works of literature is particularly significant as a means of expression for marginalized groups whose perspectives are missing from the pre-texts. Consequently, intertextual friction and a stance of resistance often mark the relationship between rewritings and their pre-texts. The focus of our multidisciplinary paper is to analyze the implications of rewriting for EU copyright law. Rewritings are contextualized on the continuum between infringing adaptation and free use outside the scope of protection. Copyright law faces the dilemma that it should reward the creative power of the pre-text’s author, while not stifling the creative power expressed in rewriting. We evoke a responsibility for copyright law to enable rewriting and assess potential strategies of how copyright law can meet this responsibility.

GRUR InternationalVol. 74(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.