Integrating geometric data analysis and network analysis by iterative reciprocal mapping. The example of the German field of sociology

• Innovative integration of network analysis and geometric data analysis. • Assessing homology and heterology relation between a scientific field and sub-fields. • Position in field does not necessarily imply interacting with spatially close colleagues. • Sub-fields are partially heterologous to main field. This paper presents an iterative procedure for reconstructing a scientific field by relating two relational methods. The procedure involves using geometric data analysis and network analysis in several steps. Blocks from block model analysis are projected into a space constructed by MCA, considered as subspaces using CSA, and subsequently inspected with regard to their manifest interaction structures. The findings allow us to examine the overall structure of a scientific field vis-à-vis the relative autonomies and eigenstructures of its subspaces and the homology-heterology relations they show to each other and the main space, thus providing a more differentiated view of the interplay of social spaces and networks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Poetics
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101947
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating geometric data analysis and network analysis by iterative reciprocal mapping. The example of the German field of sociology

Christian Schmidt-Wellenburg, Jonas Volle, Andreas Schmitz
3 citations
Poetics
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
0.84
article

Integrating geometric data analysis and network analysis by iterative reciprocal mapping. The example of the German field of sociology

Christian Schmidt-Wellenburg, Jonas Volle, Andreas Schmitz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Innovative integration of network analysis and geometric data analysis. • Assessing homology and heterology relation between a scientific field and sub-fields. • Position in field does not necessarily imply interacting with spatially close colleagues. • Sub-fields are partially heterologous to main field. This paper presents an iterative procedure for reconstructing a scientific field by relating two relational methods. The procedure involves using geometric data analysis and network analysis in several steps. Blocks from block model analysis are projected into a space constructed by MCA, considered as subspaces using CSA, and subsequently inspected with regard to their manifest interaction structures. The findings allow us to examine the overall structure of a scientific field vis-à-vis the relative autonomies and eigenstructures of its subspaces and the homology-heterology relations they show to each other and the main space, thus providing a more differentiated view of the interplay of social spaces and networks.

PoeticsVol. 108
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.