Tokenizers for African Languages

Despite incredible development in the field of natural language processing (NLP), there has been a huge gap in the performance of NLP tasks between high-resource languages (HRLs) and low-resource languages (LRLs). African languages belong mainly to the LRLs, and one of the major contributing factors to the performance gap is tokenization, which plays a crucial role in NLP performance in general. Many recent studies on African languages often rely on multilingual tokenizers or general-purpose tokenizers, which are not optimized for African languages. This may lead to suboptimal performance in downstream NLP tasks. In this paper, we systematically analyze the performance of language-specific tokenizers for three African languages: Swahili, Hausa, and Yoruba. By experimental results on two classification tasks (i.e. sentiment classification and news classification), we found that the language-specific tokenizers for African languages consistently outperformed other monolingual tokenizers, with performance gaps of up to 5.43% in sentiment classification and 4.58% in news classification. We also found that multilingual tokenizers generally work well if they are trained in many African languages rather than global HRLs. For instance, African multilingual tokenizers outperformed global multilingual tokenizers by an average of 1.70% in sentiment classification and 1.41% in news classification. The largest observed improvement was 2.61% in news classification using Logistic Regression (LR). Based on the results, we suggest a method for choosing tokenizers when analyzing data or developing models for African languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3522285
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tokenizers for African Languages

Young-Seob Jeong, Medard Edmund Mswahili, Goodwill Erasmo Ndomba
1 citations
IEEE Access
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
article

Tokenizers for African Languages

Young-Seob Jeong, Medard Edmund Mswahili, Goodwill Erasmo Ndomba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite incredible development in the field of natural language processing (NLP), there has been a huge gap in the performance of NLP tasks between high-resource languages (HRLs) and low-resource languages (LRLs). African languages belong mainly to the LRLs, and one of the major contributing factors to the performance gap is tokenization, which plays a crucial role in NLP performance in general. Many recent studies on African languages often rely on multilingual tokenizers or general-purpose tokenizers, which are not optimized for African languages. This may lead to suboptimal performance in downstream NLP tasks. In this paper, we systematically analyze the performance of language-specific tokenizers for three African languages: Swahili, Hausa, and Yoruba. By experimental results on two classification tasks (i.e. sentiment classification and news classification), we found that the language-specific tokenizers for African languages consistently outperformed other monolingual tokenizers, with performance gaps of up to 5.43% in sentiment classification and 4.58% in news classification. We also found that multilingual tokenizers generally work well if they are trained in many African languages rather than global HRLs. For instance, African multilingual tokenizers outperformed global multilingual tokenizers by an average of 1.70% in sentiment classification and 1.41% in news classification. The largest observed improvement was 2.61% in news classification using Logistic Regression (LR). Based on the results, we suggest a method for choosing tokenizers when analyzing data or developing models for African languages.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Chungbuk National University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.