Determination of the Importance Level of Basic Criteria in Building Construction with AHP and FAHP Methods

The primary expectations from buildings include safety, cost-effectiveness, aesthetics, durability, functionality, and sustainability. Addressing these complex criteria and potential trade-offs requires determining their relative importance to guide construction practices. This study evaluates these criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Interviews with seven engineering experts helped define the criteria. Subsequently, 22 architects and engineers performed pairwise comparisons, producing individual matrices. These matrices were aggregated into a single matrix via geometric averaging, with consistency verified. Safety emerged as the highest priority, followed by durability, while the remaining criteria were balanced. FAHP enhanced robustness by integrating fuzzy logic to handle subjective judgments. The findings offer practical insights for designers, contractors, and industry professionals, aiding in informed decision-making and prioritization of building criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1451408
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of the Importance Level of Basic Criteria in Building Construction with AHP and FAHP Methods

Sinan Güneş, Serkan Yıldız
1 citations
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.27
article

Determination of the Importance Level of Basic Criteria in Building Construction with AHP and FAHP Methods

Sinan Güneş, Serkan Yıldız
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The primary expectations from buildings include safety, cost-effectiveness, aesthetics, durability, functionality, and sustainability. Addressing these complex criteria and potential trade-offs requires determining their relative importance to guide construction practices. This study evaluates these criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Interviews with seven engineering experts helped define the criteria. Subsequently, 22 architects and engineers performed pairwise comparisons, producing individual matrices. These matrices were aggregated into a single matrix via geometric averaging, with consistency verified. Safety emerged as the highest priority, followed by durability, while the remaining criteria were balanced. FAHP enhanced robustness by integrating fuzzy logic to handle subjective judgments. The findings offer practical insights for designers, contractors, and industry professionals, aiding in informed decision-making and prioritization of building criteria.

Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)Vol. 9(2)
Gazi Hastanesi (TR)
Ankara Universitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.