Ephemeris Theories JPL DE, INPOP, and EPM

In this paper, we have provided an overview and description of three leading sources of planetary ephemerides: the ephemerides from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and their developed ephemeris theory DE; the ephemerides from the Institute of Celestial Mechanics and Ephemeris Calculation (IMCCE) and their developed theory INPOP; and the ephemeris theory EPM developed at the Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS). The methods and observational data sets used in constructing each of the theories have been described. A comparison of the ephemerides computed within these theories has been made using examples from future space missions. It has been shown that the differences in computed positions do not exhibit systematic characteristics and represent rather random discrepancies caused by variations in dynamic models and the observational data taken into account. The overall conclusion from the comparison of the ephemerides has been that none of the considered options (JPL DE, EPM, and INPOP) has an advantage in terms of accuracy. All three options have been equally valid, and any of the three ephemeris options can be used in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy Reports
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063772924700938
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ephemeris Theories JPL DE, INPOP, and EPM

N. V. Emelyanov, Yu. A. Moiseev
5 citations
Astronomy Reports
Astro and Planetary Science
1.66
article

Ephemeris Theories JPL DE, INPOP, and EPM

N. V. Emelyanov, Yu. A. Moiseev
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we have provided an overview and description of three leading sources of planetary ephemerides: the ephemerides from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and their developed ephemeris theory DE; the ephemerides from the Institute of Celestial Mechanics and Ephemeris Calculation (IMCCE) and their developed theory INPOP; and the ephemeris theory EPM developed at the Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences (IAA RAS). The methods and observational data sets used in constructing each of the theories have been described. A comparison of the ephemerides computed within these theories has been made using examples from future space missions. It has been shown that the differences in computed positions do not exhibit systematic characteristics and represent rather random discrepancies caused by variations in dynamic models and the observational data taken into account. The overall conclusion from the comparison of the ephemerides has been that none of the considered options (JPL DE, EPM, and INPOP) has an advantage in terms of accuracy. All three options have been equally valid, and any of the three ephemeris options can be used in practice.

Astronomy ReportsVol. 68(11)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Astro and Planetary Science
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ephemeris Theories JPL DE, INPOP, and EPM — N. V. Emelyanov, Yu. A. Moiseev · Astronomy Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS