Ultrastructure of the molar enamel in representatives of the genus Ellobius (Rodentia) in the Pleistocene and Holocene of Ukraine

New data on the enamel ultrastructure of molars of selected extinct and extant representatives of the genus Ellobius (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) from the Pleistocene of the south of Eastern Europea, mainly from the territory of Ukraine, are presen¬ted. Among the analysed species are the extinct Е. tiliguliensis, E. paleotal¬pinus, E. tarchankutensis, E. tauricus, and E. melitopoliensis, some extinct populations of Ellobius talpinus from the Late Pleistocene, as well as the extant E. talpinus and E. fuscocapillus. It was revealed that the enamel of molars of these species has the same structure as the enamel of Cricetidae and it belongs to three types described by Koenigswald (1980): radial, tangential, and lamellar. Radial enamel is the prevailing type in Ellobius, which is the initial form in the evolutionary process of other types. According to Kilic et al. [1997], radial enamel can also be divided into three groups (І, ІІ, and ІІІ) by the arrangement of the interprismatic matrix (IPM) and prismatic enamel (PE) in its structure. The first type is characterised by an almost linear arrangement of IPM and PE, whereas the second type is reticulate, and the third one is always located near the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) and is connected to dentin, the matrix of enamel formation. It was shown that in the lineage of the subgenus Ellobius and in the formation of the species E. talpinus the second type of radial enamel predominated, whereas weakly expressed lamellar enamel of various levels of evolutionary development is present only on the tips of conids (primitive and progressive enamel). In contrast, in the lineage of the subgenus Bramus (= Afganomys) and the formation of the species E. fuscocapillus monotypic (according to the density of IPM and PE) first type radial enamel predominates and lamellar enamel is absent. This line of development by morphological characters has traditionally been considered as progressive evolution of the genus, although (as it turned out) it is characterised by a more primitive enamel structure (lack of lamellar enamel). As a result, we were able to further substantiate the phylogeny of the genus Ellobius with new data from the morphologocal analysis of molars and to outline the prospects for possible use of the enamel structure as a character in the taxonomy and phylogeny of species of Cricetidae.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Theriologia Ukrainica
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53452/tu2807
Primary Topic
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrastructure of the molar enamel in representatives of the genus Ellobius (Rodentia) in the Pleistocene and Holocene of Ukraine

Leonid Rekovets, Vitalii Demeshkant
Theriologia Ukrainica
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
article

Ultrastructure of the molar enamel in representatives of the genus Ellobius (Rodentia) in the Pleistocene and Holocene of Ukraine

Leonid Rekovets, Vitalii Demeshkant
article en

Abstract

New data on the enamel ultrastructure of molars of selected extinct and extant representatives of the genus Ellobius (Arvicolinae, Rodentia) from the Pleistocene of the south of Eastern Europea, mainly from the territory of Ukraine, are presen¬ted. Among the analysed species are the extinct Е. tiliguliensis, E. paleotal¬pinus, E. tarchankutensis, E. tauricus, and E. melitopoliensis, some extinct populations of Ellobius talpinus from the Late Pleistocene, as well as the extant E. talpinus and E. fuscocapillus. It was revealed that the enamel of molars of these species has the same structure as the enamel of Cricetidae and it belongs to three types described by Koenigswald (1980): radial, tangential, and lamellar. Radial enamel is the prevailing type in Ellobius, which is the initial form in the evolutionary process of other types. According to Kilic et al. [1997], radial enamel can also be divided into three groups (І, ІІ, and ІІІ) by the arrangement of the interprismatic matrix (IPM) and prismatic enamel (PE) in its structure. The first type is characterised by an almost linear arrangement of IPM and PE, whereas the second type is reticulate, and the third one is always located near the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) and is connected to dentin, the matrix of enamel formation. It was shown that in the lineage of the subgenus Ellobius and in the formation of the species E. talpinus the second type of radial enamel predominated, whereas weakly expressed lamellar enamel of various levels of evolutionary development is present only on the tips of conids (primitive and progressive enamel). In contrast, in the lineage of the subgenus Bramus (= Afganomys) and the formation of the species E. fuscocapillus monotypic (according to the density of IPM and PE) first type radial enamel predominates and lamellar enamel is absent. This line of development by morphological characters has traditionally been considered as progressive evolution of the genus, although (as it turned out) it is characterised by a more primitive enamel structure (lack of lamellar enamel). As a result, we were able to further substantiate the phylogeny of the genus Ellobius with new data from the morphologocal analysis of molars and to outline the prospects for possible use of the enamel structure as a character in the taxonomy and phylogeny of species of Cricetidae.

Theriologia UkrainicaVol. 2024(28)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Animal Diversity and Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.