Models of prompt response on exceptional circumstances in law enforcement and safety

Introduction: this article presents an analysis of the models of response employed by executive authorities in emergency circumstances. The authors justify the necessity of supplementing the centralized model of command and control with models of coordination. It is highlighted that there is a need to extend the autonomy of responders deployed to the scene of an incident in order to enable them to make response decisions. Materials and Methods: in preparing this article, a comprehensive range of specialized literature and a substantial collection of empirical materials reflecting the practice of prompt response to emergencies in diverse countries were examined. The distinctive features of normative-legal regulations governing the mitigation of adverse factors were also considered. The case-interview method was employed to identify the organizational attributes of prompt services. A comparative approach was employed to examine the experiences of prompt response units in foreign countries. Results: the findings of the study indicate that during the initial deployment of forces and resources until the implementation of a specific legal framework, the primary responsibility for responding to emergencies lies with the frontline units of law enforcement agencies. The practice of law enforcement agencies in emergency situations demonstrates the necessity for supplementing the centralised management model with models of horizontal coordination of front-line units' actions, thereby affording them autonomy in decision-making during the initial response period. Discussion and Conclusions: it is evident that the forward coordination model cannot be regarded as an isolated method for organising an emergency response. The forward units deployed to the scene of an incident are in possession of more detailed information about the actual situation. However, in contrast to the higher levels of management, they lack the comprehensive information that characterises the prompt situation. The intricate nature of the negative factors in question necessitates interagency collaboration, which the units directly engaged in suppression activities are unable to achieve without assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA Russia
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37973/vestnikkui-2024-58-1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models of prompt response on exceptional circumstances in law enforcement and safety

Valentin Shestak, Pavel Kurlovich
Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA Russia
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Models of prompt response on exceptional circumstances in law enforcement and safety

Valentin Shestak, Pavel Kurlovich
article en

Abstract

Introduction: this article presents an analysis of the models of response employed by executive authorities in emergency circumstances. The authors justify the necessity of supplementing the centralized model of command and control with models of coordination. It is highlighted that there is a need to extend the autonomy of responders deployed to the scene of an incident in order to enable them to make response decisions. Materials and Methods: in preparing this article, a comprehensive range of specialized literature and a substantial collection of empirical materials reflecting the practice of prompt response to emergencies in diverse countries were examined. The distinctive features of normative-legal regulations governing the mitigation of adverse factors were also considered. The case-interview method was employed to identify the organizational attributes of prompt services. A comparative approach was employed to examine the experiences of prompt response units in foreign countries. Results: the findings of the study indicate that during the initial deployment of forces and resources until the implementation of a specific legal framework, the primary responsibility for responding to emergencies lies with the frontline units of law enforcement agencies. The practice of law enforcement agencies in emergency situations demonstrates the necessity for supplementing the centralised management model with models of horizontal coordination of front-line units' actions, thereby affording them autonomy in decision-making during the initial response period. Discussion and Conclusions: it is evident that the forward coordination model cannot be regarded as an isolated method for organising an emergency response. The forward units deployed to the scene of an incident are in possession of more detailed information about the actual situation. However, in contrast to the higher levels of management, they lack the comprehensive information that characterises the prompt situation. The intricate nature of the negative factors in question necessitates interagency collaboration, which the units directly engaged in suppression activities are unable to achieve without assistance.

Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA RussiaVol. 15(4)
Volgograd Academy of the Russian Internal Affairs Ministry (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.