Criminal offenses against the environment: proportionality in the context of the approximation of acts of the European Union

The article examines the peculiarities of proportionality and subsidiarity in the context of the approximation of the acts of the acquis communautaire of the European Union (EU) in terms of criminal offenses against the environment. It has been established that Directive (EU) 2024/1203 of the European Parliament and the Council on the protection of the environment by means of criminal law of April 11, 2024 changed the approaches to responsibility for criminal offenses against the environment. It was found that the main innovation is the need to criminalize some actions against the environment, which are committed not only intentionally, but also due to carelessness. In Art. 3 of the Directive provides a list of acts that can be committed in the form of gross negligence. It was established that Directive (EU) 2024/1203 supports a broad approach to the concept of the victim not only as a natural or legal person, but also society as a whole and the environment. It is argued that the means of responding to criminal offenses should be proportionate, taking into account the interests of all subjects of criminal legal relations, that is, the victim, the person who committed the criminal offense, society as a whole, the state, as well as the environment (taking into account the specifics of these criminal offenses). It is substantiated that the development of a mechanism for the representation of the environment by interested public organizations in criminal proceedings could be an effective means of environmental protection. Defects of proposals to supplement the Criminal Code with articles on responsibility for storing wood, disproportionality of the means of influence on persons who commit relevant acts, risks of abuse by law enforcement agencies, corruption component, and the possibility of prosecuting people who are engaged in harvesting wood for heating their own houses, and not wood sales operators (as provided for in the relevant EU Regulation). It is substantiated that for the approximation of European legislation, a systematic understanding of European law and the context of the adoption of relevant norms and compliance with the principles of legal certainty, predictability, proportionality, presumption of innocence, subsidiarity, etc. is important.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2024.22.315245
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal offenses against the environment: proportionality in the context of the approximation of acts of the European Union

Liliia Timofieieva
1 citations
Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
0.69
article

Criminal offenses against the environment: proportionality in the context of the approximation of acts of the European Union

Liliia Timofieieva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the peculiarities of proportionality and subsidiarity in the context of the approximation of the acts of the acquis communautaire of the European Union (EU) in terms of criminal offenses against the environment. It has been established that Directive (EU) 2024/1203 of the European Parliament and the Council on the protection of the environment by means of criminal law of April 11, 2024 changed the approaches to responsibility for criminal offenses against the environment. It was found that the main innovation is the need to criminalize some actions against the environment, which are committed not only intentionally, but also due to carelessness. In Art. 3 of the Directive provides a list of acts that can be committed in the form of gross negligence. It was established that Directive (EU) 2024/1203 supports a broad approach to the concept of the victim not only as a natural or legal person, but also society as a whole and the environment. It is argued that the means of responding to criminal offenses should be proportionate, taking into account the interests of all subjects of criminal legal relations, that is, the victim, the person who committed the criminal offense, society as a whole, the state, as well as the environment (taking into account the specifics of these criminal offenses). It is substantiated that the development of a mechanism for the representation of the environment by interested public organizations in criminal proceedings could be an effective means of environmental protection. Defects of proposals to supplement the Criminal Code with articles on responsibility for storing wood, disproportionality of the means of influence on persons who commit relevant acts, risks of abuse by law enforcement agencies, corruption component, and the possibility of prosecuting people who are engaged in harvesting wood for heating their own houses, and not wood sales operators (as provided for in the relevant EU Regulation). It is substantiated that for the approximation of European legislation, a systematic understanding of European law and the context of the adoption of relevant norms and compliance with the principles of legal certainty, predictability, proportionality, presumption of innocence, subsidiarity, etc. is important.

Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of UkraineVol. 2(22)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.