Remembered and Forgotten: The Nineteenth-Century Flemish and Dutch Famine in Cultural Memory

In the years 1845-48 Belgium and the Netherlands suffered from famine as a result from potato blight. This article explores the question why this famine became a building block of Flemish identity leading to its inclusion in the Flemish canon, while the Dutch potato crisis still largeley remains forgotten. It is argued that the famine in Flanders was intrinsically linked with the nineteenth-century Flemish movement, thereby contributing to the self-image of ''poor Flanders''. By contrast, the emergence of Dutch identity goes further back in history and is mainly connected to prototypical disasters, such as floods. Famine did not suit this storyline and the ''superior'' ability of the Dutch to manage the water. This article also stresses the need for transnational approaches in the study of famine memories. A comparative approach makes it possible to understand why the same type of traumatic event was forgotten relatively quickly in one case, and became part of the collective memory in the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dutch Crossing
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2025.2441531
Primary Topic
Philippine History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remembered and Forgotten: The Nineteenth-Century Flemish and Dutch Famine in Cultural Memory

Lotte Jensen
Dutch Crossing
Philippine History and Culture
article

Remembered and Forgotten: The Nineteenth-Century Flemish and Dutch Famine in Cultural Memory

Lotte Jensen
article en

Abstract

In the years 1845-48 Belgium and the Netherlands suffered from famine as a result from potato blight. This article explores the question why this famine became a building block of Flemish identity leading to its inclusion in the Flemish canon, while the Dutch potato crisis still largeley remains forgotten. It is argued that the famine in Flanders was intrinsically linked with the nineteenth-century Flemish movement, thereby contributing to the self-image of ''poor Flanders''. By contrast, the emergence of Dutch identity goes further back in history and is mainly connected to prototypical disasters, such as floods. Famine did not suit this storyline and the ''superior'' ability of the Dutch to manage the water. This article also stresses the need for transnational approaches in the study of famine memories. A comparative approach makes it possible to understand why the same type of traumatic event was forgotten relatively quickly in one case, and became part of the collective memory in the other.

Dutch CrossingVol. 49(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Philippine History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Remembered and Forgotten: The Nineteenth-Century Flemish and Dutch Famine in Cultural Memory — Lotte Jensen · Dutch Crossing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS