Modular Augmented Arthroplasty System to Manage Larger Bone Defects in the Ankle: A Case Series

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Large bone defects such as those encountered after failed total ankle replacement have previously been a relative contraindication to revision ankle replacement due to inadequate bone stock. We describe our early experience and patient reported outcomes with a modular ankle replacement system with tibial and talar augments. Methods: This is a retrospective case series analysis of patients who underwent a total ankle replacement using the INVISION system across two centres between 2016 and 2022. Local approvals were granted. Patients completed f the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and EQ-5D pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and re-operations. X-rays were reviewed for cysts or lucencies and alignment. Results: 17 patients were included in the study; 14 men and 3 women with an average age at the time of surgery of 67.9 years (range 56 years to 80 years). The average follow-up post operatively was 40.5 months (range 7 to 78). The indication for surgery was revision of failed TAR in 16 and revision of failed ankle fusion in 1. An augmented tibia was used in 13, augmented talus in 13, and both augmented tibia and talus in 9 cases. There were no early surgical complications. One patient required debridement and implant retention for late deep infection. No implants have been revised. The average MOXFQ score improved by 19.3 points at most recent follow up. The average AOS score improved by 25.2 points. Conclusion: The early results of a modular augmented ankle arthroplasty system have shown satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication and re-operation rate, however, this study is confined to two centres, has a small patient number and relatively short follow up period. Further research with longer follow up periods will be beneficial in the future to support revision ankle replacement systems as another option for patients with larger bone defects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00370
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modular Augmented Arthroplasty System to Manage Larger Bone Defects in the Ankle: A Case Series

David Townshend, Ian Sharpe, Rebecca Martin, Michael Dean et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Modular Augmented Arthroplasty System to Manage Larger Bone Defects in the Ankle: A Case Series

David Townshend, Ian Sharpe, Rebecca Martin, Michael Dean, Rajesh Kakwani, An Murty
article en

Abstract

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Large bone defects such as those encountered after failed total ankle replacement have previously been a relative contraindication to revision ankle replacement due to inadequate bone stock. We describe our early experience and patient reported outcomes with a modular ankle replacement system with tibial and talar augments. Methods: This is a retrospective case series analysis of patients who underwent a total ankle replacement using the INVISION system across two centres between 2016 and 2022. Local approvals were granted. Patients completed f the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and EQ-5D pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and re-operations. X-rays were reviewed for cysts or lucencies and alignment. Results: 17 patients were included in the study; 14 men and 3 women with an average age at the time of surgery of 67.9 years (range 56 years to 80 years). The average follow-up post operatively was 40.5 months (range 7 to 78). The indication for surgery was revision of failed TAR in 16 and revision of failed ankle fusion in 1. An augmented tibia was used in 13, augmented talus in 13, and both augmented tibia and talus in 9 cases. There were no early surgical complications. One patient required debridement and implant retention for late deep infection. No implants have been revised. The average MOXFQ score improved by 19.3 points at most recent follow up. The average AOS score improved by 25.2 points. Conclusion: The early results of a modular augmented ankle arthroplasty system have shown satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication and re-operation rate, however, this study is confined to two centres, has a small patient number and relatively short follow up period. Further research with longer follow up periods will be beneficial in the future to support revision ankle replacement systems as another option for patients with larger bone defects.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 9(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.