Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Edema Following Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Using Zirconia versus Carbide Burs

Aim: The use of zirconia burs with low thermal conductivity in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars may improve postoperative patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using zirconia burs on postoperative edema, trismus, and pain in impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and Method: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between January and July 2023 with participants who underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction surgery at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The primary outcome measures were facial volume and surface area change measured by a mobile 3D scanning device. Postoperative maximum interincisal opening (MIO) and pain (measured by the VAS) were secondary outcome measures for this study. Age, sex, classification and position of the mandibular third molar were the demographic variables. Facial volume changes, MIO, and pain were compared within and between groups using a general linear model. Results: A total of 40 patients aged between 18 and 45 years were included in the final analysis. Postoperative facial volume, surface area, MIO, and pain did not significantly differ between the zirconia group and the carbide bur group on days 3 and 7 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of zirconia burs for bone removal in mandibular wisdom tooth extraction did not result in a statistically significant difference with regard to postoperative facial edema, MIOs or pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1471621
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Edema Following Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Using Zirconia versus Carbide Burs

Ferit Bayram, Gökhan Göçmen, Sardar Fattahzade
ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Edema Following Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Using Zirconia versus Carbide Burs

Ferit Bayram, Gökhan Göçmen, Sardar Fattahzade
article en

Abstract

Aim: The use of zirconia burs with low thermal conductivity in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars may improve postoperative patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using zirconia burs on postoperative edema, trismus, and pain in impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and Method: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between January and July 2023 with participants who underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction surgery at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The primary outcome measures were facial volume and surface area change measured by a mobile 3D scanning device. Postoperative maximum interincisal opening (MIO) and pain (measured by the VAS) were secondary outcome measures for this study. Age, sex, classification and position of the mandibular third molar were the demographic variables. Facial volume changes, MIO, and pain were compared within and between groups using a general linear model. Results: A total of 40 patients aged between 18 and 45 years were included in the final analysis. Postoperative facial volume, surface area, MIO, and pain did not significantly differ between the zirconia group and the carbide bur group on days 3 and 7 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of zirconia burs for bone removal in mandibular wisdom tooth extraction did not result in a statistically significant difference with regard to postoperative facial edema, MIOs or pain.

ADO Klinik Bilimler DergisiVol. 14(1)
Marmara University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.