Hardware Removal after Lisfranc ORIF Results in Immediate Improvement in Physical Function

Category: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hardware removal (HWR) after Lisfranc open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is often standard following successful treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether HWR after Lisfranc ORIF resulted in immediate, measurable impact via PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain intensity (PI) scores. Methods: A retrospective review of all adult patients with surgically treated, isolated Lisfranc injuries at one tertiary level 1 trauma center between 2002-2023 was performed. Demographic data and patient reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded. Patients were excluded if they received index treatment other than ORIF, underwent secondary surgical intervention for their Lisfranc injury other than HWR, or if HWR did not occur in the standard 3-6 month interval following ORIF. Patients who underwent HWR and had PROMIS scores collected at their postoperative visit were compared to those with retained hardware by 6 months. The primary outcome was patient reported measures of PROMIS PF and PI. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared differences between PRO scores within the HWR removal group and the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test compared differences between HWR and no HWR groups. Distributive MCID was calculated using the 0.5 SD method. Results: We identified 482 patients (489 feet) with isolated Lisfranc injuries. Of these, seventy-seven feet underwent ORIF followed by HWR. Thirty feet had ORIF but did not have HWR. HWR occurred an average of 132 days (4.5 months) after ORIF. Patients who underwent HWR had a statistically significant increase in average PF scores in the immediate postoperative period, reaching the calculated MCID of 3.3 (40.2 to 45.6, p< 0.001). HWR patients also had a non-significant decrease in average PI scores (55.9 to 54.2, p=0.103). Compared to those who did not undergo HWR, the HWR group demonstrated a statistically significant net improvement in PF scores from surgery, with an average improvement of 4.7 postoperatively (P=0.003). Conclusion: Patients experienced immediate and significant improvement in PROMIS PF scores after HWR for Lisfranc ORIF. HWR patients also had a non-significant decrease in average PROMIS PI scores.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00307
Primary Topic
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hardware Removal after Lisfranc ORIF Results in Immediate Improvement in Physical Function

Megan Campbell, Lucas S. Marchand, David L. Rothberg, Justin M. Haller et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
article

Hardware Removal after Lisfranc ORIF Results in Immediate Improvement in Physical Function

Megan Campbell, Lucas S. Marchand, David L. Rothberg, Justin M. Haller, Tyler Thorne, Thomas F. Higgins, Willie Dong, Oliver Sroka
article en

Abstract

Category: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hardware removal (HWR) after Lisfranc open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is often standard following successful treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether HWR after Lisfranc ORIF resulted in immediate, measurable impact via PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain intensity (PI) scores. Methods: A retrospective review of all adult patients with surgically treated, isolated Lisfranc injuries at one tertiary level 1 trauma center between 2002-2023 was performed. Demographic data and patient reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded. Patients were excluded if they received index treatment other than ORIF, underwent secondary surgical intervention for their Lisfranc injury other than HWR, or if HWR did not occur in the standard 3-6 month interval following ORIF. Patients who underwent HWR and had PROMIS scores collected at their postoperative visit were compared to those with retained hardware by 6 months. The primary outcome was patient reported measures of PROMIS PF and PI. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared differences between PRO scores within the HWR removal group and the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test compared differences between HWR and no HWR groups. Distributive MCID was calculated using the 0.5 SD method. Results: We identified 482 patients (489 feet) with isolated Lisfranc injuries. Of these, seventy-seven feet underwent ORIF followed by HWR. Thirty feet had ORIF but did not have HWR. HWR occurred an average of 132 days (4.5 months) after ORIF. Patients who underwent HWR had a statistically significant increase in average PF scores in the immediate postoperative period, reaching the calculated MCID of 3.3 (40.2 to 45.6, p< 0.001). HWR patients also had a non-significant decrease in average PI scores (55.9 to 54.2, p=0.103). Compared to those who did not undergo HWR, the HWR group demonstrated a statistically significant net improvement in PF scores from surgery, with an average improvement of 4.7 postoperatively (P=0.003). Conclusion: Patients experienced immediate and significant improvement in PROMIS PF scores after HWR for Lisfranc ORIF. HWR patients also had a non-significant decrease in average PROMIS PI scores.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.