Foot and Ankle Patient Education Materials and Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: A Comparative Analysis

Category: Other; Sports Introduction/Purpose: On its current trajectory, AI chatbots may become the primary source of information for patient education material in the field of orthopaedics. Despite this, there has been no evaluation of the accuracy and validity of foot and ankle patient education material generated by AI platforms. The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of foot and ankle patient education material generated by the ai chatbots, as they compare to the AOFAS recommended patient education website, footcaremd.org. Methods: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI were used to generate patient educational materials on ten of the most common foot and ankle conditions. The content from these ai language model platforms was analyzed and compared with footcaremd.org for accuracy of included information. Accuracy was determined for each of the ten conditions on a basis of included information regarding background, symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatments, surgical options, recovery procedures, and risks or preventions. Results: When compared to the reference standard of the AOFAS website: footcaremd.org, the AI language model platforms consistently scored below 60% in accuracy rates in all categories of the articles analyzed. ChatGPT was found to contain an average of 46.2% of key content across all included conditions when compared to footcaremd.org. Comparatively, Google Bard contained an average of 36.5% and Bing AI contained 28.0% of information included on footcaremd.org. Conclusion: AI language model generated patient education regarding common foot and ankle conditions provides limited content accuracy across all three AI chatbot platforms. Clinicians should be aware of the increasing popularity of these platforms and be prepared to answer questions or clarify misunderstandings, and when appropriate direct patients to more validated education material such as footcaremd.org.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00295
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foot and Ankle Patient Education Materials and Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: A Comparative Analysis

Selene G. Parekh, Aarav S. Parekh, David I. Pedowitz, Joseph McCahon et al.
1 citations
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

Foot and Ankle Patient Education Materials and Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: A Comparative Analysis

Selene G. Parekh, Aarav S. Parekh, David I. Pedowitz, Joseph McCahon, Joseph N. Daniel, Amy Nghe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Category: Other; Sports Introduction/Purpose: On its current trajectory, AI chatbots may become the primary source of information for patient education material in the field of orthopaedics. Despite this, there has been no evaluation of the accuracy and validity of foot and ankle patient education material generated by AI platforms. The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of foot and ankle patient education material generated by the ai chatbots, as they compare to the AOFAS recommended patient education website, footcaremd.org. Methods: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI were used to generate patient educational materials on ten of the most common foot and ankle conditions. The content from these ai language model platforms was analyzed and compared with footcaremd.org for accuracy of included information. Accuracy was determined for each of the ten conditions on a basis of included information regarding background, symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatments, surgical options, recovery procedures, and risks or preventions. Results: When compared to the reference standard of the AOFAS website: footcaremd.org, the AI language model platforms consistently scored below 60% in accuracy rates in all categories of the articles analyzed. ChatGPT was found to contain an average of 46.2% of key content across all included conditions when compared to footcaremd.org. Comparatively, Google Bard contained an average of 36.5% and Bing AI contained 28.0% of information included on footcaremd.org. Conclusion: AI language model generated patient education regarding common foot and ankle conditions provides limited content accuracy across all three AI chatbot platforms. Clinicians should be aware of the increasing popularity of these platforms and be prepared to answer questions or clarify misunderstandings, and when appropriate direct patients to more validated education material such as footcaremd.org.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 9(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.