New insights on the role of auxiliary information in target speaker extraction

Speaker extraction (SE) aims to isolate the speech of a target speaker from a mixture of interfering speakers with the help of auxiliary information. Several forms of auxiliary information have been employed in single-channel SE, such as a speech snippet enrolled from the target speaker or visual information corresponding to the spoken utterance. The effectiveness of the auxiliary information in SE is typically evaluated by comparing the extraction performance of SE with uninformed speaker separation (SS) methods. Following this evaluation procedure, many SE studies have reported performance improvement compared to SS, attributing this to the auxiliary information. However, recent advancements in deep neural network architectures, which have shown remarkable performance for SS, suggest an opportunity to revisit this conclusion. In this paper, we examine the role of auxiliary information in SE across multiple datasets and various input conditions. Specifically, we compare the performance of two SE systems (audio-based and video-based) with SS using a unified framework that utilizes the commonly used dual-path recurrent neural network architecture. Experimental evaluation on various datasets demonstrates that the use of auxiliary information in the considered SE systems does not always lead to better extraction performance compared to the uninformed SS system. Furthermore, we offer new insights into how SE systems select the target speaker by analyzing their behavior when provided with different and distorted auxiliary information given the same mixture input.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Signal Processing
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsip.2024.1440401
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New insights on the role of auxiliary information in target speaker extraction

Srikanth Raj Chetupalli, Emanuël A. P. Habets, Soumitro Chakrabarty, Wolfgang Mack et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Signal Processing
Speech and Audio Processing
0.70
article

New insights on the role of auxiliary information in target speaker extraction

Srikanth Raj Chetupalli, Emanuël A. P. Habets, Soumitro Chakrabarty, Wolfgang Mack, Mohamed Elminshawi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Speaker extraction (SE) aims to isolate the speech of a target speaker from a mixture of interfering speakers with the help of auxiliary information. Several forms of auxiliary information have been employed in single-channel SE, such as a speech snippet enrolled from the target speaker or visual information corresponding to the spoken utterance. The effectiveness of the auxiliary information in SE is typically evaluated by comparing the extraction performance of SE with uninformed speaker separation (SS) methods. Following this evaluation procedure, many SE studies have reported performance improvement compared to SS, attributing this to the auxiliary information. However, recent advancements in deep neural network architectures, which have shown remarkable performance for SS, suggest an opportunity to revisit this conclusion. In this paper, we examine the role of auxiliary information in SE across multiple datasets and various input conditions. Specifically, we compare the performance of two SE systems (audio-based and video-based) with SS using a unified framework that utilizes the commonly used dual-path recurrent neural network architecture. Experimental evaluation on various datasets demonstrates that the use of auxiliary information in the considered SE systems does not always lead to better extraction performance compared to the uninformed SS system. Furthermore, we offer new insights into how SE systems select the target speaker by analyzing their behavior when provided with different and distorted auxiliary information given the same mixture input.

Frontiers in Signal ProcessingVol. 4
International Audio Laboratories Erlangen (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Speech and Audio Processing
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.