Relationships Among Values, Design, Stakeholders, and Beliefs – A Preliminary Analysis of Student Perceptions

Emerging design processes like value sensitive design place greater importance on socio-technical and value considerations. However, there is a lack of consensus on whether technologies or engineering processes are value neutral or laden. This study explores engineering student perceptions related to value considerations and their broader beliefs. Twenty second-year engineering students completed a survey that included value statements, design priorities, Belief in a Just World questionnaire, and subsets of the Portrait Values questionnaire. Students consistently perceived that institutional and stakeholder values need to be considered in the design process but felt their own values had less importance. Some correlations between survey elements aligned with more traditional engineering mindsets while others aligned with more emerging engineering mindsets. Students with a more traditional mindset identified a smaller role for values in engineering design. There is a need for a larger, longitudinal study to more deeply understand student perceptions related to values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18480
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships Among Values, Design, Stakeholders, and Beliefs – A Preliminary Analysis of Student Perceptions

Jennifer Howcroft, Russell Kirkscey, Julie Vale
2 citations
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.91
article

Relationships Among Values, Design, Stakeholders, and Beliefs – A Preliminary Analysis of Student Perceptions

Jennifer Howcroft, Russell Kirkscey, Julie Vale
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Emerging design processes like value sensitive design place greater importance on socio-technical and value considerations. However, there is a lack of consensus on whether technologies or engineering processes are value neutral or laden. This study explores engineering student perceptions related to value considerations and their broader beliefs. Twenty second-year engineering students completed a survey that included value statements, design priorities, Belief in a Just World questionnaire, and subsets of the Portrait Values questionnaire. Students consistently perceived that institutional and stakeholder values need to be considered in the design process but felt their own values had less importance. Some correlations between survey elements aligned with more traditional engineering mindsets while others aligned with more emerging engineering mindsets. Students with a more traditional mindset identified a smaller role for values in engineering design. There is a need for a larger, longitudinal study to more deeply understand student perceptions related to values.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
University of Waterloo
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
2.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.