Underspecified <i>they</i> becomes specified early in sentence processing

We investigated underspecification in sentence processing, using the ambiguous pronoun <i>they</i> as a case study. We asked whether <i>they</i> is processed as underspecified for number, and probed into when it acquires its number specification in incremental processing. A key question we address is whether underspecification is due to the fact that the pronoun is lexically underspecified for number or due to shallow processing. Based on the findings from an acceptability judgment study and two reading time studies using the Maze task, we conclude that <i>they</i> is lexically underspecified for number and that the processor homes in on a more enriched specification of <i>they</i> early, soon after it links with its antecedent and before fully disambiguating material is encountered. The data suggest that readers will develop detailed commitments to semantic representations for ambiguous expressions early in processing. We discuss how this finding stands in contrast to underspecified plural definite descriptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Cognition and Neuroscience
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2024.2443975
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underspecified they becomes specified early in sentence processing

Keir Moulton, Dennis Ryan Storoshenko, Holly Gendron, Chung–hye Han et al.
1 citations
Language Cognition and Neuroscience
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
article

Underspecified they becomes specified early in sentence processing

Keir Moulton, Dennis Ryan Storoshenko, Holly Gendron, Chung–hye Han, Sara Williamson, Jesse Weir, Sander Nederveen, Trevor Block, Margaret Grant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigated underspecification in sentence processing, using the ambiguous pronoun <i>they</i> as a case study. We asked whether <i>they</i> is processed as underspecified for number, and probed into when it acquires its number specification in incremental processing. A key question we address is whether underspecification is due to the fact that the pronoun is lexically underspecified for number or due to shallow processing. Based on the findings from an acceptability judgment study and two reading time studies using the Maze task, we conclude that <i>they</i> is lexically underspecified for number and that the processor homes in on a more enriched specification of <i>they</i> early, soon after it links with its antecedent and before fully disambiguating material is encountered. The data suggest that readers will develop detailed commitments to semantic representations for ambiguous expressions early in processing. We discuss how this finding stands in contrast to underspecified plural definite descriptions.

Language Cognition and NeuroscienceVol. 40(4)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.