On the Uses of Decolonial History for Life

This essay provides arguments in favor of decolonizing the field of Russian and East European Studies,focusing on the eighteenth-century history of Ukrainian-Russian relations. It envisages two directions fordecolonization: overcoming the traditional narrative of Russian history and rethinking the basic categorieswe use to tell the history of the Russian Empire. It argues that we should reconsider a one-sided view ofempire as an embodiment of the politics of difference and pay more attention to the early modern policies of acculturation and assimilation that took the form of russification in the Russian Empire. It also emphasizes the need to overcome reductionism, typical of traditional national history. The history of the Ukrainian-Russian encounter in the early modern period cannot be presented as a black-and-white narrative of Russian subjugation and repression and Ukrainian resistance. It was a more complex story that also included a dimension of cultural entanglement with strong mutual influences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ВИВЛIОθИКА E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21900/j.vivliofika.v12.1825
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Uses of Decolonial History for Life

Volodymyr Sklokin
1 citations
ВИВЛIОθИКА E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
1.13
article

On the Uses of Decolonial History for Life

Volodymyr Sklokin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This essay provides arguments in favor of decolonizing the field of Russian and East European Studies,focusing on the eighteenth-century history of Ukrainian-Russian relations. It envisages two directions fordecolonization: overcoming the traditional narrative of Russian history and rethinking the basic categorieswe use to tell the history of the Russian Empire. It argues that we should reconsider a one-sided view ofempire as an embodiment of the politics of difference and pay more attention to the early modern policies of acculturation and assimilation that took the form of russification in the Russian Empire. It also emphasizes the need to overcome reductionism, typical of traditional national history. The history of the Ukrainian-Russian encounter in the early modern period cannot be presented as a black-and-white narrative of Russian subjugation and repression and Ukrainian resistance. It was a more complex story that also included a dimension of cultural entanglement with strong mutual influences.

ВИВЛIОθИКА E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian StudiesVol. 12
Ukrainian Catholic University (UA)
Central European University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.