Incentives, Health, and Retirement: Evidence From a Finnish Pension Reform

This paper examines, using exogenous variation generated by a Finnish pension reform implemented in 2005, the interplay between health and financial incentives to postpone retirement. Based on detailed administrative data on individual health and retirement behavior, we focus on whether individual reactions to incentives vary according to health status and analyze whether individuals with ill health are also able to take advantage of the potential monetary benefits of delayed retirement created by the reform. We find that on average, individuals react to the financial incentives created by the reform as expected. This result holds for most of the health-related subgroups we analyze. However, those with a long period of sickness absence are less likely to respond to changes in the financial incentives to postpone retirement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4917
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentives, Health, and Retirement: Evidence From a Finnish Pension Reform

Pekka Martikainen, Kaisa Kotakorpi, Mikko Laaksonen, Joonas Ollonqvist et al.
2 citations
Health Economics
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
3.42
article

Incentives, Health, and Retirement: Evidence From a Finnish Pension Reform

Pekka Martikainen, Kaisa Kotakorpi, Mikko Laaksonen, Joonas Ollonqvist, Lasse Tarkiainen, Jukka Pirttilä
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines, using exogenous variation generated by a Finnish pension reform implemented in 2005, the interplay between health and financial incentives to postpone retirement. Based on detailed administrative data on individual health and retirement behavior, we focus on whether individual reactions to incentives vary according to health status and analyze whether individuals with ill health are also able to take advantage of the potential monetary benefits of delayed retirement created by the reform. We find that on average, individuals react to the financial incentives created by the reform as expected. This result holds for most of the health-related subgroups we analyze. However, those with a long period of sickness absence are less likely to respond to changes in the financial incentives to postpone retirement.

Health EconomicsVol. 34(3)
University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University (FI), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), Finnish Centre for Pensions (FI), VATT Institute for Economic Research (FI), Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, European Commission, Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Turun Yliopisto, Strategic Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Retirement, Disability, and Employment
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incentives, Health, and Retirement: Evidence From a Finnish Pension Reform — Pekka Martikainen, Kaisa Kotakorpi, et al. · Health Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS