State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations

<b>Background:</b> Community pharmacies have grown to be an increasingly important provider of CLIA-waived tests, just second to physician offices as the venue with the most waivers. Yet, individual variation is still observed across states with respect to the percentage of pharmacies holding a CLIA-waiver, with a reported range of 10.7% in Massachusetts to 87.9% in Delaware. <b>Objective:</b> To identify how state laws can either impede or enhance access to POCT services by pharmacies by comparing the percentage of pharmacies in each state holding a CLIA-waiver to the legal model for POCT services in each state. <b>Methods:</b> Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLIA Laboratory Search website reported on December 4, 2023, were used to determine the number of pharmacies holding CLIA-waivers in each state. This was then divided by the number of community pharmacies in each state, as reported in the 2023 National Community Pharmacy Association Digest, and then compared with 2 public reports on pharmacy CLIA laws. <b>Results:</b> States categorized as allowing pharmacists to independently perform CLIA-waived tests in public reports actually had a lower percentage of pharmacies with a CLIA-waiver (49.60%) than those categorized as <i>not</i> allowing CLIA-waived tests (60.19%). As many as 10 241 pharmacies hold a CLIA-waiver in states that did not affirmatively report that pharmacists ordering lab tests was allowed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The paradoxical finding is likely a result of the underreporting of pharmacist CLIA-waived testing authority given the complexity of pharmacy law relative to other professions. Simplifying pharmacy law through adoption of a "standard of care" regulatory approach may enhance patient access to POCT services moving forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225241306678
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations

Alex J. Adams, Donald G. Klepser, Michael E. Klepser
1 citations
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
0.34
article

State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations

Alex J. Adams, Donald G. Klepser, Michael E. Klepser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Community pharmacies have grown to be an increasingly important provider of CLIA-waived tests, just second to physician offices as the venue with the most waivers. Yet, individual variation is still observed across states with respect to the percentage of pharmacies holding a CLIA-waiver, with a reported range of 10.7% in Massachusetts to 87.9% in Delaware. <b>Objective:</b> To identify how state laws can either impede or enhance access to POCT services by pharmacies by comparing the percentage of pharmacies in each state holding a CLIA-waiver to the legal model for POCT services in each state. <b>Methods:</b> Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CLIA Laboratory Search website reported on December 4, 2023, were used to determine the number of pharmacies holding CLIA-waivers in each state. This was then divided by the number of community pharmacies in each state, as reported in the 2023 National Community Pharmacy Association Digest, and then compared with 2 public reports on pharmacy CLIA laws. <b>Results:</b> States categorized as allowing pharmacists to independently perform CLIA-waived tests in public reports actually had a lower percentage of pharmacies with a CLIA-waiver (49.60%) than those categorized as <i>not</i> allowing CLIA-waived tests (60.19%). As many as 10 241 pharmacies hold a CLIA-waiver in states that did not affirmatively report that pharmacists ordering lab tests was allowed. <b>Conclusion:</b> The paradoxical finding is likely a result of the underreporting of pharmacist CLIA-waived testing authority given the complexity of pharmacy law relative to other professions. Simplifying pharmacy law through adoption of a "standard of care" regulatory approach may enhance patient access to POCT services moving forward.

Journal of Pharmacy TechnologyVol. 41(2)
Ferris State University (US), Family Medicine Residency of Idaho (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.