Leader Identification and Disidentification: Constructs, Measurements, and Nomological Network

Leaders play a pivotal role in shaping employee interactions, making it crucial to understand employee identity within this relationship. While leader identification has been extensively researched, leader disidentification remains relatively underexplored. This research seeks to address this gap from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. First, it defines and elaborates on the concepts of leader identification and disidentification through a comprehensive literature review. Second, across four empirical studies, the research develops and validates scales for measuring these constructs and explores their conceptual distinctiveness. Study 1 is a qualitative investigation that examines leader disidentification in organizations through interviews with 10 full-time employees, leading to the development of a new scale. Study 2 validates the content of the leader identification and disidentification scales using data from 50 participants. Study 3, involving 172 participants, confirms the reliability and construct validity of both scales. Finally, Study 4, with data from 293 participants, explores the nomological network surrounding leader identification and disidentification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518241301235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leader Identification and Disidentification: Constructs, Measurements, and Nomological Network

ChungJen Chien
1 citations
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Cultural Differences and Values
0.64
article

Leader Identification and Disidentification: Constructs, Measurements, and Nomological Network

ChungJen Chien
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Leaders play a pivotal role in shaping employee interactions, making it crucial to understand employee identity within this relationship. While leader identification has been extensively researched, leader disidentification remains relatively underexplored. This research seeks to address this gap from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. First, it defines and elaborates on the concepts of leader identification and disidentification through a comprehensive literature review. Second, across four empirical studies, the research develops and validates scales for measuring these constructs and explores their conceptual distinctiveness. Study 1 is a qualitative investigation that examines leader disidentification in organizations through interviews with 10 full-time employees, leading to the development of a new scale. Study 2 validates the content of the leader identification and disidentification scales using data from 50 participants. Study 3, involving 172 participants, confirms the reliability and construct validity of both scales. Finally, Study 4, with data from 293 participants, explores the nomological network surrounding leader identification and disidentification.

Journal of Leadership & Organizational StudiesVol. 32(1)
Yuan Ze University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cultural Differences and Values
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leader Identification and Disidentification: Constructs, Measurements, and Nomological Network — ChungJen Chien · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS