A comparative analysis of a central metaphyseal humeral fixation stemless shoulder arthroplasty to an anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in a national registry cohort
The rates of revision between the AFS design and other stemless prostheses were similar. Stemless had lower revision rates to aTSA. When only considering XLPE cemented glenoids, there was no significant difference in revision rates.
Authors
- Richard L. Page (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5603-1330)
- Elliott D’Costa
- Dane Christopher Peckston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-0612)
- David R.J. Gill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-630X)
- Dylan Harries (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-6989)
- Mohammed Baba
Institutions
- Barwon Health (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital (AU)
- North West Regional Hospital (AU)
- Australian Orthopaedic Association (AU)
- St Vincent’s Private Hospital Brisbane (AU)
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
- St John of God Hospital (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Shoulder & Elbow
- Published
- 2024-12-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241307245
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Australian Government
- Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government